• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺寸和测量技术都很重要:术前体格检查和计算机断层扫描在预测疝大小方面的准确性以及切口疝的当前手术操作术语编码。

Size and measurement technique both matter: accuracy of preoperative physical exam and computed tomography in predicting hernia size and current procedural terminology codes for incisional hernia.

作者信息

Ayuso Sullivan A, Anderson Derrius, Rwigema Jean-Christophe, Opel Elliot, Kuchta Kristine, Hedberg H Mason, Ujiki Michael B, Linn John G

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal & General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.

Grainger Center for Simulation and Innovation, Evanston Hospital, Room B665, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11987-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11987-9
PMID:40691335
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2023, new current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were introduced for anterior abdominal wall hernias based on hernia size, reducibility, and recurrence. When insurance prior authorization is required for hernia repair, it is necessary to estimate the size of the hernia to provide the appropriate CPT code. The aim of this study is to determine whether or not preoperative physical exam (PE) and imaging accurately predict the intraoperative size and thereby CPT code.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained, single-institution hernia database was queried for patients undergoing elective incisional hernia repair from 2023 to 2024. Hernia size from most recent preoperative PE and CT scan within six months of surgery (if available) were compared to the intraoperative size. The percent congruence was determined between preoperative PE/CT and operative size/CPT code. Standard descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

145 patients underwent incisional hernia repair during the study period. One quarter (24.8%) of the hernias were recurrent and 11.7% were incarcerated. Preoperatively, 59.3% of patients had a CT scan available for review and 74.5% of patients had size documented on PE. Mean defect size was 5.5 × 5.3 cm by CT, 6.1 × 4.9 cm by PE, and 10 × 5.8 cm by intraoperative measurement (p < 0.01). In 46.9% of cases, the CPT code was different than that predicted on PE or CT; 97.2% of these discordant patients had hernias that are larger than predicted, and 43.4% had multiple smaller defects noted in the operative report.

CONCLUSION

Since the inception of the 2023 hernia CPT update, greater than four in ten patients had an operative CPT code that did not match the CPT code predicted on PE and CT. When CPT incongruence existed, hernia size intraoperatively was frequently larger than predicted and was associated with swiss cheese defects. A larger hernia CPT code may lead to increased out-of-pocket cost for patients who require preauthorization.

摘要

背景

2023年,基于疝的大小、可复性和复发情况,引入了用于腹壁前疝的新现行程序编码(CPT)。当疝修补术需要保险预先授权时,有必要估计疝的大小以提供合适的CPT编码。本研究的目的是确定术前体格检查(PE)和影像学检查能否准确预测术中疝的大小,从而确定CPT编码。

方法

查询一个前瞻性维护的单机构疝数据库,以获取2023年至2024年接受择期切口疝修补术的患者信息。将手术前六个月内最近一次术前PE和CT扫描(如有)测得的疝大小与术中大小进行比较。确定术前PE/CT与手术大小/CPT编码之间的一致百分比。使用标准描述性统计方法。

结果

在研究期间,145例患者接受了切口疝修补术。四分之一(24.8%)的疝为复发性疝,11.7%为嵌顿性疝。术前,59.3%的患者有CT扫描结果可供查看,74.5%的患者在PE中记录了疝的大小。CT测得的平均缺损大小为5.5×5.3cm,PE测得的为6.1×4.9cm,术中测量的为10×5.8cm(p<0.01)。在46.9%的病例中,CPT编码与PE或CT预测的不同;在这些不一致的患者中,97.2%的疝比预测的大,43.4%的患者在手术报告中发现有多个较小的缺损。

结论

自2023年疝CPT更新以来,超过十分之四的患者手术CPT编码与PE和CT预测的CPT编码不匹配。当CPT不一致时,术中疝的大小通常比预测的大,并且与“瑞士奶酪”样缺损有关。对于需要预先授权的患者,较大的疝CPT编码可能会导致自付费用增加。

相似文献

1
Size and measurement technique both matter: accuracy of preoperative physical exam and computed tomography in predicting hernia size and current procedural terminology codes for incisional hernia.尺寸和测量技术都很重要:术前体格检查和计算机断层扫描在预测疝大小方面的准确性以及切口疝的当前手术操作术语编码。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11987-9.
2
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
3
Drain versus no drain in elective open incisional hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis using the ACHQC database.择期开放性切口疝修补术中引流与不引流的比较:使用ACHQC数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 29;29(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03439-z.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Systemic and local collagen turnover in hernia patients.疝气患者的全身和局部胶原蛋白更新情况。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
6
Study of morphological changes observed on abdominal CT scan after preoperative treatment with botulinum toxin type A in patients with midline incisional hernias or lateral component.对接受A型肉毒杆菌毒素术前治疗的中线切口疝或外侧疝患者腹部CT扫描观察到的形态学变化的研究。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2025 Jul;103(7):800117. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800117. Epub 2025 May 16.
7
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
8
Mesh-reinforced compared with primary closure in emergent laparotomies for incarcerated ventral incisional hernias: Is the added complexity justified?在急诊剖腹手术治疗嵌顿性腹直肌切口疝中,与一期缝合相比,使用补片加强修补:增加的复杂性是否合理?
Surgery. 2025 Sep;185:109536. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109536. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
9
The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery.腹股沟疝修补术后复发的流行病学及危险因素
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4846.
10
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Coding Changes and Reported Hernia Size.医疗保险编码变更与报告的疝气大小
JAMA. 2025 Mar 4;333(9):808-810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26829.
2
Implications of declining medicare reimbursement of hernia repair for surgeons and patients.医保报销减少对疝修补术外科医生和患者的影响。
Am J Surg. 2023 Aug;226(2):291-293. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.03.015. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
Ventral hernia repair: an increasing burden affecting abdominal core health.腹壁疝修补术:影响腹核心健康的日益加重的负担。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):415-421. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02707-6. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
4
Open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: Prospective observational study of quality improvement outcomes over 18 years and 1,842 patients.经腹膜前开放型腹疝修补术:18 年 1842 例患者前瞻性观察性研究质量改进结果。
Surgery. 2023 Mar;173(3):739-747. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.042. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
The impact of weight change on intra-abdominal and hernia volumes.体重变化对腹腔内和疝体积的影响。
Surgery. 2020 May;167(5):876-882. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
Large Incisional Hernias Increase in Size.巨大切口疝会增大。
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Insufflation Effects on the Abdominal Wall Dimensions and Incisional-Ventral Hernia Orifice Size.注气对腹壁尺寸和切口疝口大小的影响。
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:274-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
8
Taking Control of Your Surgery: Impact of a Prehabilitation Program on Major Abdominal Surgery.掌控你的手术:术前康复计划对大型腹部手术的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jan;228(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Computed tomography in ventral hernia diagnosis: have we improved? A quality improvement initiative.计算机断层扫描在腹疝诊断中的应用:我们是否有所进步?一项质量改进计划。
J Surg Res. 2018 Apr;224:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.055. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
10
Contraction of abdominal wall muscles influences size and occurrence of incisional hernia.腹壁肌肉收缩会影响切口疝的大小和发生率。
Surgery. 2015 Jul;158(1):278-88. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Mar 25.