Bertrand Delphine, De Meyst Elias, Doumen Michaël, De Cock Diederik, Joly Johan, Neerinckx Barbara, Pazmino Sofia, Pype Nele, Conings Tom, Westhovens René, Verschueren Patrick
Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
UZ Leuven, Rheumatology, Leuven, Belgium.
BMC Rheumatol. 2025 Jul 21;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s41927-025-00530-x.
BACKGROUND: Rituximab is known as an efficacious drug for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). The original administration schedule consisted of two infusions of 1000 mg with a 2-week interval. We aimed to explore the long-term effectiveness of rituximab in daily clinical practice in patients with RA. METHODS: Data of patients with RA treated with rituximab in a tertiary university hospital (2006-2019) were retrospectively collected from rituximab initiation until December 1st 2019 or rituximab discontinuation, whichever came first. Rituximab retreatment was based on a treat-to-target-approach guided by a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) ≥ 3.2, as dictated by national reimbursement criteria. Rituximab retention rate was investigated using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve. RESULTS: We collected data of 104 patients (59% female, 94% RF/ACPA-seropositive). At rituximab initiation, patients had a mean ± SD age of 58 ± 12 years and median disease duration of 12 (IQR 5-17) years. Patients were followed for a median of 40 (IQR 14-80) months and received a median of 3 (IQR 2-6) rituximab cycles. In total, 9% (9/104) patients discontinued rituximab and 14% (15/104) were treated with a reduced dose. Inherent to the retreatment strategy, disease activity fluctuated with a DAS28-increase before every new rituximab administration. Similar fluctuations were noticed for patient and physician reported outcomes. Proportion of patients continuing rituximab after three years was 94% (95% CI 89% - 99%). CONCLUSIONS: Although rituximab can be considered as an efficacious drug for RA treatment in daily practice, fluctuations in disease activity were noticed related to the retreatment approach, accompanied by impaired patient's wellbeing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
背景:利妥昔单抗是治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的一种有效药物。最初的给药方案是两次输注1000毫克,间隔2周。我们旨在探讨利妥昔单抗在RA患者日常临床实践中的长期疗效。 方法:回顾性收集一所三级大学医院(2006 - 2019年)中接受利妥昔单抗治疗的RA患者的数据,从开始使用利妥昔单抗至2019年12月1日或停止使用利妥昔单抗(以先发生者为准)。利妥昔单抗再治疗基于国家报销标准规定的以28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)≥3.2为指导的达标治疗方法。使用Kaplan - Meier生存曲线研究利妥昔单抗保留率。 结果:我们收集了104例患者的数据(59%为女性,94%为RF/ACPA血清阳性)。开始使用利妥昔单抗时,患者的平均年龄±标准差为58±12岁,疾病中位数病程为12(四分位间距5 - 17)年。患者的中位随访时间为40(四分位间距14 - 80)个月,接受利妥昔单抗治疗的中位数周期为3(四分位间距2 - 6)个。总共有9%(9/104)的患者停止使用利妥昔单抗,14%(15/104)的患者接受了减量治疗。由于再治疗策略的原因,每次新的利妥昔单抗给药前疾病活动度会随着DAS28升高而波动。患者和医生报告的结局也有类似的波动。三年后继续使用利妥昔单抗的患者比例为94%(95%置信区间89% - 99%)。 结论:尽管在日常实践中利妥昔单抗可被视为治疗RA的有效药物,但注意到疾病活动度的波动与再治疗方法有关,同时患者的健康状况也受到影响。 试验注册:不适用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-1-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-7-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-22
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024-2-28
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024-8-1
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024-1-4
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022-2-2