Zhou Jianxing, Xiao Bo, Wei Zipeng, Jia Mengting, Luo Xin, Wei Huimin, Zhang Xiaohan, Liu Maobai, Zhang Yifan, Wu Xuemei
Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Shanghai, China.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;14(8):1359-1369. doi: 10.1002/psp4.70056. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
Patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD) frequently present with hypertension, necessitating polypharmacy and increasing the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This study evaluated the safety of combining isavuconazole (ISA), a triazole antifungal drug (TAD), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive patients with IFD using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models. FAERS data on hypertension and hypotension involving TADs from 2015 (first quarter) to 2023 (fourth quarter) were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methods. DDI models were developed and validated using the Simcyp simulator and in vitro experiments. Dose regimen evaluation and optimization were conducted using the established DDI model. ISA was not associated with hypertension or hypotension. Nifedipine and amlodipine were frequently associated with hypotension induced by CYP3A4 inhibition. The simulated regimens showed that ISA doubled plasma exposure to nifedipine immediate-release (IR) and controlled-release (CR) formulations, increased the maximum concentration by 1.51-fold for nifedipine IR and 2.15-fold for nifedipine CR, and caused a 3.5- to 4.09-fold increase in maximum systolic blood pressure reduction for nifedipine IR. The effects of amlodipine were negligible. Dose optimization, such as halving the nifedipine dose, effectively managed the overexposure. ISA appears safe for use in hypertensive patients with IFD when combined with CCBs, with minimal risk of significant DDIs. Personalized dosing adjustments can mitigate DDI risk. These findings support the clinical use of ISA to enhance dosing precision and patient safety.
侵袭性真菌病(IFD)患者常伴有高血压,需要联合使用多种药物,从而增加了药物相互作用(DDI)的风险。本研究使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和基于生理的药代动力学/药效学模型,评估了三唑类抗真菌药物(TAD)艾沙康唑(ISA)与钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)联合用于IFD高血压患者的安全性。使用了2015年(第一季度)至2023年(第四季度)期间FAERS中有关TADs导致高血压和低血压的数据。采用报告比值比(ROR)和信息成分(IC)方法进行不成比例分析。使用Simcyp模拟器和体外实验开发并验证了DDI模型。使用已建立的DDI模型进行给药方案评估和优化。ISA与高血压或低血压无关。硝苯地平和氨氯地平常与CYP3A4抑制引起的低血压有关。模拟方案显示,ISA使硝苯地平速释(IR)和控释(CR)制剂的血浆暴露量增加了一倍,使硝苯地平IR的最大浓度增加了1.51倍,硝苯地平CR的最大浓度增加了2.15倍,并使硝苯地平IR的最大收缩压降低增加了3.5至4.09倍。氨氯地平的影响可忽略不计。剂量优化,如将硝苯地平剂量减半,可有效控制药物过量暴露。ISA与CCB联合用于IFD高血压患者似乎是安全的,发生严重DDI的风险最小。个性化给药调整可降低DDI风险。这些发现支持临床使用ISA以提高给药精度和患者安全性。