Lang Angelica E, Kim Soo Y
Canadian Centre for Rural and Agricultural Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Int Biomech. 2025 Dec;12(1):18-27. doi: 10.1080/23335432.2025.2537403. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
Maximum voluntary contractions (MVCs) are the standard normalization method for muscle activity, but can be hindered by pain and injury. Submaximal normalization may be a viable option. The study objective was to compare muscle activation between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups with MVC and submaximal normalization to determine if similar relative between-groups differences could be detected. Eighteen participants, divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, performed isometric MVCs and six dynamic functional tasks. EMG data were normalized using MVC and submaximal values from a weighted overhead lift. MVCs achieved higher activation levels for most muscles, but submaximal normalization provided comparable values for serratus anterior. Significant between-group differences were observed during the Comb Hair, with higher activation in the symptomatic group for the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, and supraspinatus across both normalizations. The serratus anterior during the Overhead Reach and lower trapezius in the Tie Apron were also different between groups with both normalizations. There were some significant findings that emerged from only one normalization method. Submaximal normalization may be a viable alternative to MVC normalization for select muscles and upper limb pathological populations. Submaximal normalization allowed for meaningful comparisons of muscle activation patterns during functional tasks without the need for maximum force exertion.
最大自主收缩(MVCs)是肌肉活动的标准归一化方法,但可能会受到疼痛和损伤的阻碍。次最大归一化可能是一种可行的选择。本研究的目的是比较有症状组和无症状组在MVC和次最大归一化情况下的肌肉激活情况,以确定是否能检测到相似的组间相对差异。18名参与者被分为有症状组和无症状组,进行了等长MVCs和六项动态功能任务。肌电图(EMG)数据使用MVC和加权过头举的次最大值进行归一化。对于大多数肌肉,MVCs达到了更高的激活水平,但次最大归一化提供了与前锯肌相当的值。在梳理头发任务期间观察到显著的组间差异,在两种归一化方法下,有症状组的斜方肌上束、斜方肌中束和冈上肌的激活程度更高。在过头伸展任务期间的前锯肌以及系围裙任务中的斜方肌下束在两种归一化方法下组间也存在差异。仅从一种归一化方法中出现了一些显著的结果。对于特定肌肉和上肢病理人群,次最大归一化可能是MVC归一化的一种可行替代方法。次最大归一化允许在功能任务期间对肌肉激活模式进行有意义的比较,而无需施加最大力量。