Knight Hannah Riley, Kim Marie, Kannan Nisha, Taylor Hannah, Main Hailey, Azcue Emily, Esser-Kahn Aaron
Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Elife. 2025 Jul 23;14:e106339. doi: 10.7554/eLife.106339.
Trained immunity presents a unique target for modulating the immune response against infectious and non-infectious threats to human health. To address the unmet need for training-targeted therapies, we explore bioengineering methods to answer research questions and address clinical applications. Current challenges in trained immunity include self-propagating autoinflammatory disease, a lack of controllable cell and tissue specificity, and the unintentional induction of training by known drugs and diseases. The bioengineering tools discussed in this review (nanotherapeutics, biomechanical modulation, cellular engineering, and machine learning) could address these challenges by providing additional avenues to modulate and interrogate trained immunity. The preferential activation of peripheral or central training has not yet been achieved and could be accessed using nanoparticle systems. Targeted delivery of training stimuli using nanocarriers can enrich the response in various cell and organ systems, while also selectively activating peripheral training in the local tissues or central trained immunity in bone marrow progenitor cells. Beyond chemical- or pathogen-based activation of training, force-based cues, such as interaction with mechanoreceptors, can induce trained phenotypes in many cell types. Mechanotransduction influences immune cell activation, motility, and morphology and could be harnessed as a tool to modulate training states in next-generation therapies. For known genetic and epigenetic mediators of trained immunity, cellular engineering could precisely activate or deactivate programs of training. Genetic engineering could be particularly useful in generating trained cell-based therapies like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) macrophages. Finally, machine learning models, which are rapidly transforming biomedical research, can be employed to identify signatures of trained immunity in pre-existing datasets. They can also predict protein targets for previously identified inducers of trained immunity by modeling drug-protein or protein-protein interactions in silico. By harnessing the modular techniques of bioengineering for applications in trained immunity, training-based therapies can be more efficiently translated into clinical practice.
训练免疫为调节针对人类健康的感染性和非感染性威胁的免疫反应提供了一个独特的靶点。为了满足对训练靶向疗法的未满足需求,我们探索生物工程方法来回答研究问题并解决临床应用。训练免疫当前面临的挑战包括自身传播性自身炎症性疾病、缺乏可控的细胞和组织特异性,以及已知药物和疾病对训练的无意诱导。本综述中讨论的生物工程工具(纳米疗法、生物力学调节、细胞工程和机器学习)可以通过提供调节和研究训练免疫的额外途径来应对这些挑战。外周或中枢训练的优先激活尚未实现,可使用纳米颗粒系统来实现。使用纳米载体靶向递送训练刺激物可以丰富各种细胞和器官系统中的反应,同时还能选择性地激活局部组织中的外周训练或骨髓祖细胞中的中枢训练免疫。除了基于化学或病原体的训练激活之外,基于力的线索,如与机械感受器的相互作用,可以在许多细胞类型中诱导训练表型。机械转导影响免疫细胞的激活、运动和形态,可作为下一代疗法中调节训练状态的工具。对于训练免疫的已知遗传和表观遗传介质,细胞工程可以精确地激活或停用训练程序。基因工程在生成基于训练细胞的疗法,如嵌合抗原受体(CAR)巨噬细胞方面可能特别有用。最后,正在迅速改变生物医学研究的机器学习模型可用于在现有数据集中识别训练免疫的特征。它们还可以通过在计算机上模拟药物 - 蛋白质或蛋白质 - 蛋白质相互作用来预测先前确定的训练免疫诱导剂的蛋白质靶点。通过利用生物工程的模块化技术应用于训练免疫,可以更有效地将基于训练的疗法转化为临床实践。