Hasnida Amalia, Rahmi Mawadatti, Rahmawati Ayu, Anggriani Yusi, van Leth Frank C M, Kok Maarten Olivier
Health Care Governance, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Center for Pharmaceutical Policy, Management, and Services Studies, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta, Indonesia.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e093785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093785.
To assess the quality of amoxicillin products in Indonesia's private market by surveying the range of products available across different areas, followed by product sampling and laboratory testing.
A cross-sectional survey employing mystery shoppers to purposively sample the widest possible range of amoxicillin products available to patients across different areas in Indonesia.
Licensed and unlicensed medicine outlets in remote, rural and urban areas and online.
Amoxicillin products that are sold to patients as oral solid and dry liquid formulations.
Quality of amoxicillin products, assessed using compendial testing of active pharmaceutical ingredient content and dissolution. Samples that failed any quality test were classified as substandard or out-of-specification (OOS). The raw prevalence of substandard amoxicillin was adjusted based on the national market volume of each product variant.
We surveyed 476 outlets, mostly pharmacies (68.5%), websites (19.7%) and drug stores (10.9%). Among the 120 collected samples, there were 59 distinct products, collectively representing 95% of the estimated market volume for oral solid products and 65% for dry syrups. 12 out of 110 oral solid samples tested OOS (10.9%), as did 3 out of 10 dry syrups (30%). The samples that failed originated from various areas and types of outlets. We found no relation between the price and quality of amoxicillin.
The oral solid amoxicillin products that tested OOS represent an estimated 12.7% of the national market volume. We found no relation between the price and quality of amoxicillin. Combining product-variety sampling with data on market volume presents a promising approach to gain insight into the prevalence of poor-quality medical products using a relatively small sample size.
通过调查不同地区可得的阿莫西林产品范围,随后进行产品抽样和实验室检测,以评估印度尼西亚私营市场上阿莫西林产品的质量。
一项横断面调查,采用神秘顾客有目的地对印度尼西亚不同地区患者所能获得的尽可能广泛的阿莫西林产品进行抽样。
偏远、农村和城市地区的有许可证和无许可证的药品销售点以及在线销售渠道。
作为口服固体和干液体制剂销售给患者的阿莫西林产品。
阿莫西林产品的质量,通过对活性药物成分含量和溶出度进行药典检测来评估。任何质量检测不合格的样品被归类为不合格或超出规格(OOS)。根据每种产品变体的全国市场销量对不合格阿莫西林的原始流行率进行调整。
我们调查了476个销售点,其中大部分是药店(68.5%)、网站(19.7%)和杂货店(10.9%)。在收集的120个样品中,有59种不同的产品,共同代表了口服固体产品估计市场销量的95%和干糖浆的65%。110个口服固体样品中有12个检测为OOS(10.9%),10个干糖浆样品中有3个检测为OOS(30%)。不合格的样品来自不同地区和销售点类型。我们发现阿莫西林的价格和质量之间没有关系。
检测为OOS的口服固体阿莫西林产品估计占全国市场销量的12.7%。我们发现阿莫西林的价格和质量之间没有关系。将产品种类抽样与市场销量数据相结合,为使用相对较小的样本量深入了解劣质医疗产品的流行情况提供了一种有前景的方法。