Shah Jehangir Ali, Hussain Jamil, Ahmed Bashir, Batra Mahesh Kumar, Ali Gulzar, Naz Mariam, Khan Waqar, Bhatti Khalid Iqbal, Karim Musa, Hakeem Abdul
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan.
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, Pakistan.
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 23;4(8):101978. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101978.
Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are the standard treatment for left ventricular thrombus (LVT). However, direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban, are increasingly being considered due to their fixed dosing and lack of routine monitoring requirements.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in treating post-myocardial infarction (MI) acute LVT at 12 weeks.
We conducted an open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial involving patients with acute LVT diagnosed during initial MI hospitalization. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either rivaroxaban (20 mg daily) or warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2-3) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint, LVT resolution, was assessed by echocardiography at 4 and 12 weeks.
A total of 261 patients were randomized, with 171 in the rivaroxaban group and 90 in the warfarin group. The groups were similar in sex, age, and MI subtype, with most having ST-segment elevation MI and severe LV dysfunction. At 4 weeks, LVT resolution was higher in the rivaroxaban group (20% vs 8%; P = 0.017), with similar resolution at 12 weeks (95.8% vs 96.6%; P = 0.759). The cumulative all-cause mortality was comparable (3.5% vs 3.3%; P = 0.921). Major bleeding occurred in 2.3% of rivaroxaban patients vs 1.1% of the warfarin group (P = 0.491).
Rivaroxaban demonstrated similar efficacy to warfarin in treating post-MI LVT, with >95% resolution in both groups. Future multicenter trials with longer follow-up are needed to validate these findings (Rivaroxaban in Left Ventricular Thrombus; NCT04970576).
维生素K拮抗剂,如华法林,是左心室血栓(LVT)的标准治疗方法。然而,直接口服抗凝剂,如利伐沙班,因其固定剂量和无需常规监测的特点,越来越受到关注。
本研究旨在比较利伐沙班与华法林在治疗心肌梗死后(MI)急性LVT 12周时的有效性。
我们进行了一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照试验,纳入在首次MI住院期间诊断为急性LVT的患者。参与者按2:1随机分组,分别接受利伐沙班(每日20 mg)或华法林(目标国际标准化比值2 - 3)治疗12周。主要终点,即LVT溶解情况,在4周和12周时通过超声心动图评估。
共有261例患者被随机分组,利伐沙班组171例,华法林组90例。两组在性别、年龄和MI亚型方面相似,大多数为ST段抬高型MI且伴有严重左心室功能障碍。在4周时,利伐沙班组的LVT溶解率更高(20%对8%;P = 0.017),12周时溶解率相似(95.8%对96.6%;P = 0.759)。累积全因死亡率相当(3.5%对3.3%;P = 0.921)。利伐沙班组2.3%的患者发生大出血,而华法林组为1.1%(P = 0.491)。
利伐沙班在治疗MI后LVT方面显示出与华法林相似的疗效,两组的溶解率均>95%。需要未来进行更长随访时间的多中心试验来验证这些发现(左心室血栓中的利伐沙班;NCT04970576)。