Zaikova Anna, Kozlova Mariia, Şenaydın Osman, Havukainen Jouni, Astrup Thomas Fruergaard, Horttanainen Mika
Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Sustainability Science. Yliopistonkatu 34, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland.
Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, LUT Business School. Yliopistonkatu 34 FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland.
Waste Manag. 2025 Aug;205:115025. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.115025. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
As climate change mitigation becomes increasingly crucial, transitions in municipal solid waste management systems provide one avenue for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the identification of the most cost-effective emission reduction pathways can be challenged by various uncertainties that accompany these transitions. This study examined robustness and cost-effectiveness of solutions for reducing GHG emissions from municipal solid waste management in a real-world case study of the Gölbaşı municipality, Türkiye. The methodology combined life cycle assessment and life cycle costing for environmental and economic evaluations followed by Simulation Decomposition, which employed global sensitivity analysis to identify the most important input parameters and mapped their relative impacts on to the probability distribution of the model output. Uncertainty ranges of GHG emission reduction costs overlapped for all emission reduction pathways. Based on uncertainty decomposition results, although two pathways involving door-to-door collection of biowaste showed potential for lower emission reduction costs when biowaste collection is maximized, the pathway of door-to-door biowaste collection for electricity production (A2) was deemed unsafe as it failed in achieving emission reductions in certain conditions. Meanwhile, door-to-door collection of packaging waste (A1) and the mechanical-biological treatment of mixed waste with the production of refuse-derived fuel (A4) may be considered more robust as they carry a lower risk of high GHG emission reduction costs. Thus, this research showcased the potential of advanced hybrid sensitivity-uncertainty approaches to identify robust solutions and provide more informed recommendations for decision makers, while proving a clear need for comprehensive uncertainty consideration in today's world.
随着减缓气候变化变得日益关键,城市固体废物管理系统的转型为减少温室气体(GHG)排放提供了一条途径。然而,这些转型所伴随的各种不确定性可能会对确定最具成本效益的减排途径构成挑战。本研究在土耳其戈尔巴希市的一个实际案例研究中,考察了城市固体废物管理中减少温室气体排放解决方案的稳健性和成本效益。该方法将生命周期评估和生命周期成本核算用于环境和经济评估,随后采用模拟分解法,运用全局敏感性分析来识别最重要的输入参数,并将它们的相对影响映射到模型输出的概率分布上。所有减排途径的温室气体减排成本的不确定性范围相互重叠。基于不确定性分解结果,尽管当生物垃圾收集最大化时,两条涉及上门收集生物垃圾的途径显示出较低减排成本的潜力,但用于发电的上门收集生物垃圾途径(A2)被认为不安全,因为它在某些情况下未能实现减排。与此同时,上门收集包装垃圾途径(A1)以及对混合垃圾进行机械生物处理并生产衍生燃料途径(A4)可能被认为更稳健,因为它们产生高温室气体减排成本的风险较低。因此,本研究展示了先进的混合敏感性 - 不确定性方法在识别稳健解决方案以及为决策者提供更明智建议方面的潜力,同时也证明了在当今世界全面考虑不确定性的迫切需求。