Laganà Giuseppina, Malara Arianna, Lione Roberta, Bollero Patrizio, Cozza Paola
Department of Life, Health, and Health and Healthcare Professions, Link Campus University Rome, Rome, Italy.
Policlinico "Tor vergata", Rome, Italy.
Front Dent Med. 2025 Jul 10;6:1613037. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1613037. eCollection 2025.
To analyze the inclination of the lower incisor in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with elastics and clear aligners compared to a group wearing the same elastics and fixed appliance.
Prospective two-arms parallel group randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
A sample of 40 patients (19M and 21F), mean age 15.4 ± 1.8 years, was collected from the Department of Orthodontics at Policlinico Tor Vergata (Rome), and was randomly divided in two groups: Invisalign clear aligner group (AG), which consisted of 20 subjects (8M, 12F) and multibracket fixed appliance group (MBG), composed by 20 patients (9M, 11F). The subjects were selected according to inclusion criteria: full permanent dentition (excluding third molars), Class II molar relationship (2.5-4 mm), no history of orthodontic treatment. For each participant of the study, dental and aesthetic measurements, both millimeter and angular were performed on the lateral cephalogram at time T0 (before treatment) and time T1 (after 18 months of treatment).
In the short term (T1-T0 = 18 months), the analysis of the results showed no statistically significant changes in all evaluated parameters (IMPA, L1/A-Pg, Md1-TVL, LLA-TVL, > 0.05). Therefore, there were no statistically significant change in the inclination of the lower incisors.
The use of Class II elastics in AG group showed a better control of the lower incisors' inclination, compared to the MBG group. Therefore, aligners represent a good alternative in the correction of mild Class II malocclusion in cases where the lower incisors proclination is undesirable.
ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT06832475).
分析与佩戴相同弹力牵引装置和固定矫治器的组相比,使用弹力牵引装置和透明矫治器治疗的安氏II类错牙合患者下切牙的倾斜度。
前瞻性双臂平行组随机临床试验,分配比例为1:1。
从罗马托尔韦尔加塔综合医院正畸科收集了40例患者(19名男性和21名女性),平均年龄15.4±1.8岁,并随机分为两组:隐适美透明矫治器组(AG组),由20名受试者(8名男性,12名女性)组成;多托槽固定矫治器组(MBG组),由20名患者(9名男性,11名女性)组成。根据纳入标准选择受试者:恒牙列完整(不包括第三磨牙),安氏II类磨牙关系(2.5 - 4毫米),无正畸治疗史。对于本研究的每位参与者,在T0(治疗前)和T1(治疗18个月后)时在头颅侧位片上进行毫米和角度的牙齿及美学测量。
在短期内(T1 - T0 = 18个月),结果分析显示所有评估参数(IMPA、L1/A - Pg、Md1 - TVL、LLA - TVL,P>0.05)均无统计学显著变化。因此,下切牙倾斜度无统计学显著变化。
与MBG组相比,AG组使用II类弹力牵引装置对下切牙倾斜度的控制更好。因此,在不希望出现下切牙前倾的情况下,矫治器是矫正轻度安氏II类错牙合的良好替代方法。
ClinicalTrials.gov(注册号:NCT06832475)。