Ahmad Muhammad, Ranasinghe Chavin Akalanka, Abu-Sa'da Mais Omar, Bhimineni Durga Prasad, Noushad Muhammed Ameen, Warsi Talal, Mesmar Ahmad, Mukesh Munikaverappa Anjanappa, Patel Sagar K, Imbianozor Gabriel, Bhatty Ali Mustansir, Alareed Ahmad, Ain Quratul, Zulfiqar Eeshal, Ahmed Mushood, Ahmed Raheel
Junior Clinical Fellow Geriatrics/Acute Medicine, Aneurin Bevan University Healthboard, Caerleon NP18 3XQ, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;15(14):1812. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141812.
: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset. However, a significant proportion of patients present beyond this window. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT beyond the 4.5 h window in selected patients. : A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception to April 2025. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. : A total of 12 RCTs were included, with 3236 patients. Compared to controls, IVT significantly improved excellent functional outcomes [OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.21-1.62] and good functional outcomes [OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06-1.50] at 90 days. IVT also improved recanalization [OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.96-3.12], reperfusion [OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.26-3.84], and early neurological improvement [OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.12-3.26]. However, it was associated with a significantly higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) [OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.25-3.79], any ICH [OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.09-2.04], and type-II parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) [OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.19-3.83]. No significant difference was observed in systemic hemorrhage, 90-day all-cause mortality, 7-day mortality, or 90-day intervention-related mortality ( > 0.05). : IVT beyond 4.5 h improves neurological outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke without increasing overall mortality or systemic bleeding, though it raises the risk of sICH, any ICH, and type-II PH. Further large RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.
静脉溶栓(IVT)是症状发作4.5小时内缺血性卒中的标准治疗方法。然而,相当一部分患者在这个时间窗之后才就诊。本研究旨在评估在选定患者中4.5小时时间窗之后进行静脉溶栓的疗效和安全性。:从数据库建立至2025年4月,在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术上进行了系统的文献检索。使用随机效应模型汇总了具有95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)。:共纳入12项随机对照试验,3236例患者。与对照组相比,静脉溶栓在90天时显著改善了良好功能结局[OR:1.40;95%CI:1.21 - 1.62]和较好功能结局[OR:1.26;95%CI:1.06 - 1.50]。静脉溶栓还改善了血管再通[OR:2.47;95%CI:1.96 - 3.12]、再灌注[OR:2.20;95%CI:1.26 - 3.84]以及早期神经功能改善[OR:1.91;95%CI:1.12 - 3.26]。然而,它与症状性颅内出血(sICH)[OR:2.17;95%CI:1.25 - 3.79]、任何颅内出血(ICH)[OR:1.49;95%CI:1.09 - 2.04]以及Ⅱ型脑实质出血(PH)[OR:2.14;95%CI:1.19 - 3.83]的风险显著升高相关。在全身性出血、90天全因死亡率、7天死亡率或90天干预相关死亡率方面未观察到显著差异(>0.05)。:4.5小时之后进行静脉溶栓可改善缺血性卒中患者的神经功能结局,且不增加总体死亡率或全身性出血,尽管它会增加症状性颅内出血、任何颅内出血和Ⅱ型脑实质出血的风险。需要进一步的大型随机对照试验来证实这些发现并指导临床实践。