• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于套索逻辑回归构建低位直肠癌术后吻合口漏风险预测模型。

Building a risk prediction model for anastomotic leakage postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.

作者信息

Quan Zhenhao, Lin Lin, Huang Renwei, Sun Kaiyu, Xu Feipeng

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, No. 57 South Renmin Avenue, Xiashan District, Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province, 524001, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04128-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-04128-y
PMID:40731389
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To build a nomogram model for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.

METHODS

A total of 482 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low rectal cancer surgery in our hospital from June 2017 to May 2023 were selected as the training set, and 127 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low rectal cancer surgery in our hospital from June 2023 to April 2025 were selected as the validation set. According to whether AL occurred postoperative, the patients in the training set were divided into AL group (n = 54) and N-AL group (n = 428). The data of each group were collected, and the influencing factors of AL in patients postoperative with rectal cancer in the training set were analyzed by Lasso-Logistic regression model. H-L goodness-of-fit test, ROC curve and calibration curve were used to analyze the discrimination and consistency of the model. The nomogram model was validated using the validation set. The DCA curve was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the model.

RESULTS

In the training set, the AL group had a higher proportion of patients with tumor stage ≥ T3 and longer operation times compared to the N-AL group; additionally, fewer AL patients had a protective stoma, and the tumor was located a shorter distance from the tumor to the anal verge than in the N-AL group. (P < 0.05). Lasso-Logistic regression analysis showed that when the penalty coefficient λ = 0.02735463, the model demonstrated good performance, gender (OR = 3.107), NRS2002 score (OR = 8.619), protective stoma (OR = 0.297), distance from tumor to anal verge (OR = 0.284), operation time (OR = 1.033) were the influencing factors of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer (P < 0.05). The 5 influencing factors were introduced into R software to establish a nomogram model for the risk of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer. The area under the ROC curve was 0.940. H-L goodness of fit test showed that there was no significant difference between the predicted value of the model and the actual observed value (χ = 6.438, P = 0.598). The slope of the calibration curve was close to 1. The validation set showed that the nomogram model had good discrimination and consistency. The DCA curve showed that the model had high clinical utility and net benefit when the risk threshold was between 0.08 and 0.85.

CONCLUSION

Gender, NRS2002 rating, diverting ostomy, distance from tumor to anal margin, and operation time are all influencing factors of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer. The nomogram prediction model based on Lasso-Logistic regression has high consistency, discrimination and clinical application value.

摘要

目的

基于Lasso-Logistic回归构建预测低位直肠癌术后吻合口漏(AL)风险的列线图模型。

方法

选取2017年6月至2023年5月在我院接受低位直肠癌手术的482例直肠癌患者作为训练集,选取2023年6月至2025年4月在我院接受低位直肠癌手术的127例直肠癌患者作为验证集。根据术后是否发生AL,将训练集患者分为AL组(n = 54)和非AL组(n = 428)。收集每组数据,采用Lasso-Logistic回归模型分析训练集中直肠癌患者术后AL的影响因素。采用H-L拟合优度检验、ROC曲线和校准曲线分析模型的判别能力和一致性。用验证集对列线图模型进行验证。采用DCA曲线评估模型的临床实用性。

结果

在训练集中,与非AL组相比,AL组肿瘤分期≥T3的患者比例更高,手术时间更长;此外,行预防性造口的AL患者较少,肿瘤距肛缘的距离比非AL组短。(P < 0.05)。Lasso-Logistic回归分析显示,当惩罚系数λ = 0.02735463时,模型表现良好,性别(OR = 3.107)、NRS2002评分(OR = 8.619)、预防性造口(OR = 0.297)、肿瘤距肛缘距离(OR = 0.284)、手术时间(OR = 1.033)是低位直肠癌术后AL的影响因素(P < 0.05)。将这5个影响因素引入R软件,建立低位直肠癌术后AL风险的列线图模型。ROC曲线下面积为0.940。H-L拟合优度检验显示模型预测值与实际观察值之间无显著差异(χ = 6.438,P = 0.598)。校准曲线斜率接近1。验证集显示列线图模型具有良好的判别能力和一致性。DCA曲线显示,当风险阈值在0.08至0.85之间时,该模型具有较高的临床实用性和净效益。

结论

性别、NRS2002评分、转流造口、肿瘤距肛缘距离和手术时间均为低位直肠癌术后AL的影响因素。基于Lasso-Logistic回归的列线图预测模型具有较高的一致性、判别能力和临床应用价值。

相似文献

1
Building a risk prediction model for anastomotic leakage postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.基于套索逻辑回归构建低位直肠癌术后吻合口漏风险预测模型。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04128-y.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Clinical prediction model for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center large-sample cohort study.直肠癌手术吻合口漏的临床预测模型:一项单中心大样本队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11821-2.
4
Analysis of Risk Factors for Perioperative Transfusion in Hip Arthroplasty and Modeling of a Nomogram.髋关节置换术中围手术期输血的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建
Ann Ital Chir. 2025 Jul 10;96(7):956-966. doi: 10.62713/aic.4077.
5
Development and validation of a predictive model for anastomotic complications with mid-low rectal cancer based on propensity score matching analysis-Does robotic surgery have an advantage?基于倾向评分匹配分析的中低位直肠癌吻合口并发症预测模型的开发与验证——机器人手术是否具有优势?
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 30;19(1):336. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02285-6.
6
[Development of a nomogram for predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer].[局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解预测列线图的构建]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 25;28(3):304-313. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250106-00012.
7
Clinical diagnostic and prognostic value of homocysteine combined with hemoglobin [f (Hcy-Hb)] in cardio-renal syndrome caused by primary acute myocardial infarction.同型半胱氨酸联合血红蛋白[f(Hcy-Hb)]在原发性急性心肌梗死所致心肾综合征中的临床诊断及预后价值
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 23;23(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06512-4.
8
Development and evaluation of a dynamic nomogram model for intraoperative blood transfusion decision-making.用于术中输血决策的动态列线图模型的开发与评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 13;12:1566325. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1566325. eCollection 2025.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
A novel nomogram for predicting osteoporosis with low back pain among the patients in Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture of China.中国文山壮族苗族自治州患者中用于预测伴有腰痛的骨质疏松症的新型列线图。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 5;16:1535163. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1535163. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity after right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: results from a prospective, multi-centre, snapshot study in China.中国一项前瞻性、多中心、快照研究显示结肠癌右半结肠切除术后吻合口漏和术后发病率的危险因素。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad316.
2
Prediction of symptomatic anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery: A machine learning approach.直肠癌术后症状性吻合口漏的预测:一种机器学习方法。
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;129(2):264-272. doi: 10.1002/jso.27470. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Stoma-free Survival After Rectal Cancer Resection With Anastomotic Leakage: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model in a Large International Cohort.
直肠癌术后吻合口漏无造口生存:大型国际队列中预测模型的建立和验证。
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):772-780. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006043. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Long-term outcome after chronic anastomotic leakage following surgery for low rectal cancer.低位直肠癌手术后慢性吻合口漏的长期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Aug;37(8):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04213-8. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
Poor Pre-operative Nutritional Status Is a Risk Factor of Post-operative Infections in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer-A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.术前营养状况差是胃肠道癌患者术后感染的危险因素——一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Front Nutr. 2022 May 27;9:850063. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.850063. eCollection 2022.
6
Omentoplasty to reduce anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis.网膜成形术降低结直肠手术吻合口漏的效果:一项荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jul;92(7-8):1651-1657. doi: 10.1111/ans.17553. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
7
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group.直肠癌前切除术吻合口漏的危险因素(RALAR 研究):意大利外科肿瘤学会结直肠癌网络协作组的一项全国性回顾性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;24(3):264-276. doi: 10.1111/codi.15997. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Transanal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经肛门引流管在预防直肠癌腹腔镜低位前切除术后吻合口漏中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1151-1158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4568.
9
Application value of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery.NRS2002及PG-SGA在宫颈癌手术患者营养评估中的应用价值
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):7186-7192. eCollection 2021.
10
Anastomotic Leak: Toward an Understanding of Its Root Causes.吻合口漏:对其根本原因的理解。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov;25(11):2966-2975. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05048-4. Epub 2021 Jun 7.