Stoffel Karl, Clauss Martin, Mauch Marlene
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Center for Musculoskeletal Infections (ZMSI), University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 24;61(7):1138. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071138.
The objective was to validate the Beyond the Vancouver classification. Based on this algorithm, it was hypothesized that cemented polished tapered stems with an intact cement mantle and cementless stable stems with defined criteria could be classified as stable and therefore treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This retrospective, single-center cohort study re-analyzed patients initially diagnosed with Vancouver type B2 fractures treated with ORIF between 2007 and 2020. Clinical and radiological outcomes were extracted from medical reports. A combined radiological and clinical score was used as the main outcome measure. Patients categorized according to the Beyond the Vancouver classification were compared for functional outcome. 42 patients (25 male, 17 female) with a median (range) age of 83 years (75-88 years) and follow-up time of 25 weeks (12-35 weeks) were reviewed. It was found that ORIF achieved excellent or good results in 81% of cases for stems classified as stable (n = 16) and in 30% of cases for stems classified as loose (n = 23). Successful cases (30%), although classified as loose, all had the same fracture pattern: an intact greater trochanter and a fracture fragment attached laterally to the stem with distal fixation of the stem. This case series suggests that certain Vancouver B2 fractures can be treated with ORIF. The Beyond the Vancouver classification may support the categorization of 'stable' and 'loose' stems. The validity of the algorithm was supported by the observation that ORIF provided excellent and good results for the majority of stems classified as 'stable', but poor results for stems classified as 'loose'. Furthermore, the fracture pattern has been shown to be a crucial factor that should be considered when treating distally fixed cementless stems. The classification was therefore expanded to include the specific fracture patterns in cementless distally fixed stems that can be successfully treated with ORIF. The Beyond the Vancouver classification can provide further guidance in the identification of 'loose' or 'stable' stems.
目的是验证温哥华分类法之外的一种分类方法。基于该算法,研究假设骨水泥固定的抛光锥形柄假体且骨水泥套完整,以及符合特定标准的非骨水泥稳定型柄假体可被归类为稳定型,因此可采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)进行治疗。这项回顾性单中心队列研究重新分析了2007年至2020年间最初被诊断为温哥华B2型骨折并接受ORIF治疗的患者。从医疗报告中提取临床和放射学结果。采用综合放射学和临床评分作为主要结局指标。比较根据温哥华分类法之外的分类方法进行分类的患者的功能结局。共纳入42例患者(男性25例,女性17例),中位年龄83岁(范围75 - 88岁),随访时间25周(12 - 35周)。结果发现,对于分类为稳定型的柄假体(n = 16),ORIF在81%的病例中取得了优或良的结果;而对于分类为松动型的柄假体(n = 23),这一比例为30%。成功的病例(30%)尽管被归类为松动型,但都具有相同的骨折模式:大转子完整,骨折碎片附着于柄假体外侧且柄假体有远端固定。该病例系列表明,某些温哥华B2型骨折可用ORIF治疗。温哥华分类法之外的分类方法可能有助于对“稳定”和“松动”柄假体进行分类。该算法的有效性得到了以下观察结果的支持:ORIF对大多数分类为“稳定”的柄假体取得了优和良的结果,但对分类为“松动”的柄假体效果不佳。此外,骨折模式已被证明是治疗远端固定的非骨水泥柄假体时应考虑的关键因素。因此,该分类方法得以扩展,纳入了可通过ORIF成功治疗的远端固定非骨水泥柄假体的特定骨折模式。温哥华分类法之外的分类方法可为识别“松动”或“稳定”柄假体提供进一步指导。