Özdemir Ekrem, Özdeş Oya Olcay, Topsakal Fatih Emre, Altay Nasuhi, Demirel Esra
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, 25240 Erzurum, Türkiye.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Battalgazi State Hospital, 44320 Malatya, Türkiye.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 27;61(7):1169. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071169.
This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the predictive validity of four frailty indices-Modified Frailty Index-5 (mFI-5), Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and Trauma-Specific Frailty Index (TSFI)-in forecasting postoperative complications and functional outcomes in elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) treated either surgically or conservatively. A total of 244 patients aged ≥60 years with PHFs treated at Erzurum Hospital between January 2018 and January 2023 were included. Patients were categorized into surgical (n = 110) and conservative (n = 134) groups. Surgical procedures included open reduction and internal fixation (n = 88), hemiarthroplasty (n = 10), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (n = 12). Frailty was retrospectively assessed using mFI-5, EFS, CFS, and TSFI based on 24-month follow-up data. Outcomes included complications, reoperations, rehospitalizations, and functional results measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. The overall complication rate was 13.1%, with nonunion being the most common. Reoperation and rehospitalization rates were 10.6% and 20%, respectively. The mean ASES score was 71.3 ± 15.2, with 60% of patients achieving good or excellent outcomes. Frailty scores, particularly mFI-5 and EFS, were significantly higher in the conservatively treated group compared to the surgical group ( < 0.01). Across both treatment modalities, patients with higher frailty scores had significantly increased complication rates; however, this effect was more pronounced in the surgical group. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that mFI-5 significantly predicted complications, reoperations, and rehospitalizations ( < 0.001). EFS was associated with reoperation risk ( = 0.018), while CFS and TSFI were not significantly correlated with any of the outcomes. Among the evaluated indices, mFI-5 showed the strongest predictive accuracy for adverse outcomes in elderly PHF patients. Notably, the negative impact of frailty was more evident among surgically treated patients. Routine frailty assessment may facilitate better risk stratification and individualized treatment planning in this population.
这项回顾性队列研究旨在评估四种衰弱指数——改良衰弱指数-5(mFI-5)、埃德蒙顿衰弱量表(EFS)、临床衰弱量表(CFS)和创伤特异性衰弱指数(TSFI)——对接受手术或保守治疗的老年肱骨近端骨折(PHF)患者术后并发症和功能结局的预测效度。纳入了2018年1月至2023年1月在埃尔祖鲁姆医院接受治疗的244例年龄≥60岁的PHF患者。患者被分为手术组(n = 110)和保守组(n = 134)。手术方式包括切开复位内固定(n = 88)、半关节置换术(n = 10)和反肩关节置换术(n = 12)。基于24个月的随访数据,采用mFI-5、EFS、CFS和TSFI对衰弱进行回顾性评估。结局包括并发症、再次手术、再次住院以及通过美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分衡量的功能结果。总体并发症发生率为13.1%,骨不连最为常见。再次手术率和再次住院率分别为10.6%和20%。ASES评分的平均值为71.3±15.2,60%的患者获得了良好或优异的结局。与手术组相比,保守治疗组的衰弱评分,尤其是mFI-5和EFS,显著更高(<0.01)。在两种治疗方式中,衰弱评分较高的患者并发症发生率显著增加;然而,这种影响在手术组中更为明显。多因素逻辑回归显示,mFI-5显著预测了并发症、再次手术和再次住院(<0.001)。EFS与再次手术风险相关(=0.018),而CFS和TSFI与任何结局均无显著相关性。在评估的指数中,mFI-5对老年PHF患者不良结局的预测准确性最强。值得注意的是,衰弱的负面影响在手术治疗的患者中更为明显。常规衰弱评估可能有助于该人群更好地进行风险分层和个体化治疗规划。