: The clinical value of HER2-low breast cancer (BC), defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 1+ or 2+/ISH-negative without HER2 amplification, remains unclear in the neoadjuvant setting. This study aimed to determine whether HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors differ in pathological complete response (pCR) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) among early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). : We retrospectively analyzed 134 early BC patients treated with NAC between 2017 and 2023. Patients were categorized as HER2-zero (IHC 0) or HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-). The primary endpoint was total pCR (tpCR); secondary endpoints included breast (bpCR), nodal (npCR), and radiologic complete response (rCR), alongside DFS analysis stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status. : Of the cohort, 91 patients (67.9%) were HER2-zero and 43 (32.1%) were HER2-low. There was no statistically significant difference in tpCR (26.4% vs. 27.9%, = 0.852), bpCR (28.6% vs. 30.2%, = 0.843), npCR (37.4% vs. 32.6%, = 0.588), and rCR (23.1% vs. 30.2%, = 0.374) between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. DFS did not significantly differ between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups overall ( = 0.714), nor within HR-positive ( = 0.540) or TNBC ( = 0.523) subgroups. : HER2-low tumors demonstrated similar pathological responses and survival outcomes compared to HER2-zero tumors. While a HER2-low status does not appear to define a distinct biological subtype in early BC, it remains a relevant classification for emerging HER2-targeted therapies, needing further investigation in prospective studies.