Poggio Alan, Sullivan Andrew P, Rampa Lorenzo, Andrade Jason G, Anselmino Matteo
Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, MedInTO-Medicine and Surgery, University of Turin, 10125 Turin, Italy.
UBC Division of Cardiology, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, 2775 Laurel St., 9th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 30;61(7):1200. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071200.
: International guidelines differ on short-term (4-week) oral anticoagulation (OAC) indication after acute cardioversion for recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF < 12-48 h) in low-risk patients (CHADS-VA = 0). While Canadian and Chinese guidelines recommend OAC for all, European, Australian and New Zealand, and American guidelines state that such treatment is optional due to the absence of high-quality evidence supporting its indication in this specific scenario. This study aimed to assess physicians' management of a simple clinical case at an international level, focusing on how they balance ischemic and bleeding risks in a setting lacking any strong evidence-based recommendations. : Six different AF guidelines were evaluated regarding the recommendation for and scientific evidence justifying short-term OAC in this specific setting. Following review, an international questionnaire was developed with (Mountain View, CA, USA) and circulated among physicians working in the fields of cardiology, internal medicine, intensive care unit, geriatrics, and emergency medicine at 17 centres in Italy, France, and Canada. : A total of 78 responses were obtained. Younger physicians and cardiologists appeared to administer OAC more frequently compared to older physicians or those working in other specialties (95% CI Fisher's Exact Test = 0.049 and 0.029, respectively). Significant differences were observed in the use of periprocedural imaging, with transoesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) prior to cardioversion being performed more often in Europe vs. Canada ( = 0.006) and in long-term rhythm control, with first-line pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) being offered more frequently by European cardiologists ( = 0.013). No statistically significant association was found regarding guideline adherence for OAC administration ( = 0.120). : The real-world antithrombotic management of low-risk (CHADS-VA = 0), acutely cardioverted AF patients varies significantly among different healthcare systems. Particularly in cardiology departments, reducing the time limit for safely not prescribing OAC to < 12 h, ensuring local access to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and considering regional stroke risk profiles, as well as actively preventing haemorrhage in patients receiving short-term OAC could all limit cardioversion-related complications in this low-risk population.
国际指南对于低风险患者(CHADS-VA = 0)近期发作的房颤(房颤<12 - 48小时)急性复律后的短期(4周)口服抗凝(OAC)指征存在差异。加拿大和中国指南建议对所有此类患者进行OAC治疗,而欧洲、澳大利亚和新西兰以及美国的指南则指出,由于缺乏高质量证据支持在这一特定情况下进行OAC治疗,因此这种治疗是可选的。本研究旨在评估国际层面医生对一个简单临床病例的处理方式,重点关注在缺乏任何强有力的循证医学推荐的情况下,他们如何平衡缺血和出血风险。:评估了六种不同的房颤指南对于这一特定情况下短期OAC治疗的推荐及科学依据。审查之后,与美国加利福尼亚州山景城的Qualtrics公司合作编制了一份国际调查问卷,并在意大利、法国和加拿大17个中心的心脏病学、内科、重症监护病房、老年医学和急诊医学领域的医生中进行分发。:共获得78份回复。与年长医生或其他专科医生相比,年轻医生和心脏病专家似乎更频繁地给予OAC治疗(Fisher精确检验的95%置信区间分别为0.049和0.029)。在围手术期成像的使用方面观察到显著差异,欧洲与加拿大相比,复律前经食管超声心动图(TOE)的检查更为频繁(P = 0.006);在长期节律控制方面,欧洲心脏病专家更频繁地提供一线肺静脉隔离(PVI)治疗(P = 0.013)。在OAC给药的指南依从性方面未发现统计学上的显著关联(P = 0.120)。:在不同的医疗体系中,低风险(CHADS-VA = 0)急性复律房颤患者的实际抗栓管理存在显著差异。特别是在心脏病科,将安全不开具OAC的时间限制缩短至<12小时,确保当地可获得直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)并考虑区域卒中风险概况,以及积极预防接受短期OAC治疗患者的出血,所有这些都可以限制这一低风险人群中与复律相关的并发症。