Lazari Sahar, Masalha Muhammad, Swaid Forat, Shalata Walid, Sroka Gideon, Waked Weam, Agbarya Abed
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, 8 HaAliya HaShniya Street, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
Department of Surgery, Tzafon Medical Center, Poriya 1528001, Israel.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 16;61(7):1284. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071284.
: Gastric cancer treatment of partial or complete gastrectomy includes lymph nodes dissection (D2) to remove microscopic lymph node metastases adjacent to the tumor. A more extensive approach, an extended dissection (D2plus) has recently been employed, which includes resection of the lymph nodes in the pancreatic and periportal areas. However, despite its potential benefits of longer survival for patients diagnosed with advanced cancer, there are increased risks due to surgical complications. The current study aims to examine the balance between clinical benefit and higher risks of the extended dissection approach versus standard dissection. : This retrospective analysis of gastric cancer patients treated in Bnai-Zion medical center examined the survival rates, oncological outcomes, and complication rates according to medical records data files. : The D2plus group experienced increased postoperative complications rate (56% vs. 20.6% D2 group = 0.005) with mean survival time, shorter than the D2 standard approach (2.07 years vs. 3.44 years = 0.01). A higher number of lymph nodes was removed on average in the D2plus group (29.4 ± 11.2), but without statistical significance in comparison to the D2 group (22.6 ± 8.9, = 0.013). D2plus patients had reduced disease recurrence rates (20% vs. 32.4% in D2 group = 0.29). Weight loss of D2plus patients was noted for higher rates than the D2 group (40% vs. 17.6% = 0.056. : Our study provides preliminary insights into the comparison between D2 and D2plus dissection in a single-center Western cohort. However, significant baseline differences between groups, particularly age, gender, and histopathological characteristics, limit definitive conclusions. The findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing. Larger, prospective, multicenter studies with propensity score matching or randomized design are needed to definitively establish the optimal surgical approach for different patient subgroups.
胃癌的部分或全胃切除术治疗包括淋巴结清扫(D2),以清除肿瘤附近的微小淋巴结转移灶。最近采用了一种更广泛的方法,即扩大清扫(D2plus),包括切除胰腺和门静脉周围区域的淋巴结。然而,尽管对于诊断为晚期癌症的患者有延长生存期的潜在益处,但手术并发症导致的风险也增加。本研究旨在探讨扩大清扫方法与标准清扫相比在临床获益和更高风险之间的平衡。:本对在Bnai-Zion医疗中心接受治疗的胃癌患者的回顾性分析,根据病历数据文件检查了生存率、肿瘤学结局和并发症发生率。:D2plus组术后并发症发生率增加(56%对D2组的20.6%,P = 0.005),平均生存时间短于D2标准方法(2.07年对3.44年,P = 0.01)。D2plus组平均切除的淋巴结数量更多(29.4±11.2),但与D2组相比无统计学意义(22.6±8.9,P = 0.013)。D2plus患者的疾病复发率降低(20%对D2组的32.4%,P = 0.29)。D2plus患者体重减轻的发生率高于D2组(40%对17.6%,P = 0.056)。:我们的研究为单中心西方队列中D2和D2plus清扫的比较提供了初步见解。然而,组间显著的基线差异,特别是年龄、性别和组织病理学特征,限制了确定性结论。这些发现应被解释为产生假设而非改变实践。需要更大规模的、前瞻性的、多中心研究,采用倾向评分匹配或随机设计,以明确确定不同患者亚组的最佳手术方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-1-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004-10-18
Eur Urol. 2009-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-8-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013-8-30
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024-3-16
World J Surg Oncol. 2024-4-23
Life (Basel). 2023-8-18