文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

使用和未使用糖皮质激素治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的医疗费用和资源使用特征。

Characteristics of medical costs and resource use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with and without glucocorticoids.

作者信息

Tanaka Eiichi, Inoue Eisuke, Sakai Ryoko, Iwasaki Katsuhiko, Shoji Ayako, Harigai Masayoshi

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.

Showa University Research Administration Center (SURAC), Showa University, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 30;20(7):e0329313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329313. eCollection 2025.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0329313
PMID:40737259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12310026/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate medical costs and resource use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with and without oral or injectable glucocorticoids (GCs) as part of their initial treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients included in the Japan Medical Data Center health insurance claims database and diagnosed with RA were considered. The date of the first prescription of a DMARD (index date) after an observable 6-month period (baseline) was used to define follow-up (12 months post-index date) periods. Patients with at least one GC prescription in the follow-up period were included in the GC group, and patients without a GC prescription in the follow-up period were classified as the non-GC group. The primary endpoints were costs for drugs, treatments, and materials per patient in the follow-up period. Drugs were divided into medications for RA or for adverse events (AEs). The secondary endpoints were proportions of patients using the subcategories of each resource. The incidence of hospitalization during the follow-up period was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,670 and 1,487 patients with median ages of 51.0 and 50.0 years were evaluated in the GC and non-GC groups, respectively. The costs for drugs, treatments, and materials were significantly higher in the GC group compared with the non-GC group (GC/ non-GC; drug costs for RA and AEs, 2,818 USD/ 1,882 USD; drug costs for RA only, 2,697 USD/ 1,805 USD; treatment costs, 2,365 USD/ 1,860 USD; material costs, 112 USD/ 77 USD; P < 0.05). The resource use in almost all drug and treatment subcategories was higher in the GC group. The incidence of hospitalization was also higher in the GC group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA treated with GCs in the first year after starting DMARDs tended to use more resources and have higher medical costs than patients not treated with GCs.

摘要

目的:评估在使用改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)进行初始治疗时,接受或未接受口服或注射糖皮质激素(GCs)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的医疗费用和资源使用情况。 方法:纳入日本医疗数据中心医疗保险理赔数据库中被诊断为RA的患者。以可观察到的6个月(基线期)后首次开具DMARD的日期(索引日期)来定义随访期(索引日期后12个月)。随访期内至少有一次GC处方的患者纳入GC组,随访期内无GC处方的患者分类为非GC组。主要终点是随访期内每位患者的药物、治疗和材料费用。药物分为用于RA的药物或用于不良事件(AE)的药物。次要终点是使用每种资源子类别的患者比例。评估随访期内的住院发生率。 结果:GC组和非GC组分别评估了1670例和1487例患者,中位年龄分别为51.0岁和50.0岁。GC组的药物、治疗和材料费用显著高于非GC组(GC/非GC;RA和AE的药物费用,2818美元/1882美元;仅RA的药物费用,2697美元/1805美元;治疗费用,2365美元/1860美元;材料费用,112美元/77美元;P<0.05)。GC组几乎所有药物和治疗子类别的资源使用都更高。GC组的住院发生率也更高。 结论:开始使用DMARDs后第一年接受GCs治疗的RA患者比未接受GCs治疗的患者倾向于使用更多资源且医疗费用更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/832b/12310026/a8f43743dc14/pone.0329313.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/832b/12310026/634d1f18b48a/pone.0329313.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/832b/12310026/a8f43743dc14/pone.0329313.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/832b/12310026/634d1f18b48a/pone.0329313.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/832b/12310026/a8f43743dc14/pone.0329313.g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Characteristics of medical costs and resource use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with and without glucocorticoids.

PLoS One. 2025-7-30

[2]
Medical costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have comorbid diabetes mellitus.

PLoS One. 2025-8-1

[3]
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.

Health Technol Assess. 2006-11

[4]
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of anakinra for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults: a systematic review and economic analysis.

Health Technol Assess. 2004-5

[5]
Glucocorticoid use in rheumatoid arthritis patients and the onset of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Osteopath Med. 2023-4-1

[6]
Including adverse drug events in economic evaluations of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α drugs for adult rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of economic decision analytic models.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014-2

[7]
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis unsuccessfully treated with biologics: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-10

[8]
Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-5-13

[9]
The use of modelling to evaluate new drugs for patients with a chronic condition: the case of antibodies against tumour necrosis factor in rheumatoid arthritis.

Health Technol Assess. 2004-3

[10]
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: Characteristics and Treatment Options.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023-10-23

[2]
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2023-1

[3]
Context and Considerations for Use of Two Japanese Real-World Databases in Japan: Medical Data Vision and Japanese Medical Data Center.

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022-6

[4]
Drug treatment algorithm and recommendations from the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-secondary publication.

Mod Rheumatol. 2023-1-3

[5]
2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021-7

[6]
Glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: current status and future studies.

RMD Open. 2020-1

[7]
Clinical predictors of remission and low disease activity in Latin American early rheumatoid arthritis: data from the GLADAR cohort.

Clin Rheumatol. 2019-6-3

[8]
Remission rate and predictors of remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under treat-to-target strategy in real-world studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Rheumatol. 2018-10-19

[9]
Association Between Glucocorticoid Exposure and Healthcare Expenditures for Potential Glucocorticoid-related Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

J Rheumatol. 2018-1-15

[10]
The age at onset of rheumatoid arthritis is increasing in Japan: a nationwide database study.

Int J Rheum Dis. 2017-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索