Tanaka Eiichi, Inoue Eisuke, Sakai Ryoko, Iwasaki Katsuhiko, Shoji Ayako, Harigai Masayoshi
Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Showa University Research Administration Center (SURAC), Showa University, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 30;20(7):e0329313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329313. eCollection 2025.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate medical costs and resource use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with and without oral or injectable glucocorticoids (GCs) as part of their initial treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients included in the Japan Medical Data Center health insurance claims database and diagnosed with RA were considered. The date of the first prescription of a DMARD (index date) after an observable 6-month period (baseline) was used to define follow-up (12 months post-index date) periods. Patients with at least one GC prescription in the follow-up period were included in the GC group, and patients without a GC prescription in the follow-up period were classified as the non-GC group. The primary endpoints were costs for drugs, treatments, and materials per patient in the follow-up period. Drugs were divided into medications for RA or for adverse events (AEs). The secondary endpoints were proportions of patients using the subcategories of each resource. The incidence of hospitalization during the follow-up period was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,670 and 1,487 patients with median ages of 51.0 and 50.0 years were evaluated in the GC and non-GC groups, respectively. The costs for drugs, treatments, and materials were significantly higher in the GC group compared with the non-GC group (GC/ non-GC; drug costs for RA and AEs, 2,818 USD/ 1,882 USD; drug costs for RA only, 2,697 USD/ 1,805 USD; treatment costs, 2,365 USD/ 1,860 USD; material costs, 112 USD/ 77 USD; P < 0.05). The resource use in almost all drug and treatment subcategories was higher in the GC group. The incidence of hospitalization was also higher in the GC group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA treated with GCs in the first year after starting DMARDs tended to use more resources and have higher medical costs than patients not treated with GCs.
目的:评估在使用改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)进行初始治疗时,接受或未接受口服或注射糖皮质激素(GCs)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的医疗费用和资源使用情况。 方法:纳入日本医疗数据中心医疗保险理赔数据库中被诊断为RA的患者。以可观察到的6个月(基线期)后首次开具DMARD的日期(索引日期)来定义随访期(索引日期后12个月)。随访期内至少有一次GC处方的患者纳入GC组,随访期内无GC处方的患者分类为非GC组。主要终点是随访期内每位患者的药物、治疗和材料费用。药物分为用于RA的药物或用于不良事件(AE)的药物。次要终点是使用每种资源子类别的患者比例。评估随访期内的住院发生率。 结果:GC组和非GC组分别评估了1670例和1487例患者,中位年龄分别为51.0岁和50.0岁。GC组的药物、治疗和材料费用显著高于非GC组(GC/非GC;RA和AE的药物费用,2818美元/1882美元;仅RA的药物费用,2697美元/1805美元;治疗费用,2365美元/1860美元;材料费用,112美元/77美元;P<0.05)。GC组几乎所有药物和治疗子类别的资源使用都更高。GC组的住院发生率也更高。 结论:开始使用DMARDs后第一年接受GCs治疗的RA患者比未接受GCs治疗的患者倾向于使用更多资源且医疗费用更高。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-8
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023-10-23
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021-7