• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT-4o与DeepSeek对下颌角截骨术问题回答的比较研究

A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek Responses to Mandibular Angle Osteotomy Questions.

作者信息

Jiang Chenshan, Cheng Wenjie, Jiang Xinyi, Zhang Jianlin, Tang Xiaojun

机构信息

Department of Maxillo-facial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Ear Reconstruction, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011698.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011698
PMID:40742907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mandibular angle osteotomy (MAO) is one of the most effective ways to correct square facial contours. With the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, particularly in medicine, more patients are seeking medical queries from online websites. This study compared the performance of 2 AI platforms, ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek in answering questions about MAO.

METHODS

Twenty frequently asked questions about MAO were selected and answered by ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek. The responses from 2 platforms were graded by 9 experienced craniomaxillofacial plastic surgeons from 2 different hospitals. The relevance, accuracy, completeness, and readability of responses were evaluated. The 20 questions were divided into 4 categories: general conception, surgery process, complication, and other topics. Statistical analysis, including the 2-sided t test and Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to compare metrics.

RESULTS

Both ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek provided high-quality information about MAO. However, ChatGPT-4o outperformed in giving more thorough answers (4.4945±0.03089 vs. 4.4315±0.02519, P=0.048), and DeepSeek outperformed in giving answers more easily to read (4.2960±0.04717 vs. 4.1965±0.03986, P=0.026). Also, although ChatGPT performed well in answering all kinds of questions, DeepSeek had weak performance in answering questions regarding surgery process of MAO.

CONCLUSIONS

Both platforms offered reliable information. Compared to DeepSeek, ChatGPT-4o provided more thorough responses and was more aligned with clinical practice. This study discovered the potential of AI platforms in addressing patient education and providing medical information in craniomaxillofacial plastic surgery field.

摘要

背景

下颌角截骨术(MAO)是矫正方形面部轮廓最有效的方法之一。随着人工智能(AI)技术的发展,尤其是在医学领域,越来越多的患者在在线网站上寻求医疗咨询。本研究比较了两个AI平台ChatGPT-4o和豆包在回答有关MAO问题方面的表现。

方法

选择了20个关于MAO的常见问题,由ChatGPT-4o和豆包进行回答。来自两家不同医院的9位经验丰富的颅颌面整形外科医生对两个平台的回答进行评分。评估回答的相关性、准确性、完整性和可读性。这20个问题分为4类:一般概念、手术过程、并发症和其他主题。应用双侧t检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验等统计分析方法比较各项指标。

结果

ChatGPT-4o和豆包都提供了关于MAO的高质量信息。然而,ChatGPT-4o在给出更全面的答案方面表现更优(4.4945±0.03089对4.4315±0.02519,P=0.048),而豆包在给出更易读的答案方面表现更优(4.2960±0.04717对4.1965±0.03986,P=0.026)。此外,尽管ChatGPT在回答各类问题方面表现良好,但豆包在回答关于MAO手术过程的问题时表现较弱。

结论

两个平台都提供了可靠的信息。与豆包相比,ChatGPT-4o提供了更全面的回答,并且与临床实践更相符。本研究发现了AI平台在颅颌面整形外科领域进行患者教育和提供医疗信息方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek Responses to Mandibular Angle Osteotomy Questions.ChatGPT-4o与DeepSeek对下颌角截骨术问题回答的比较研究
J Craniofac Surg. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011698.
2
Evaluating DeepResearch and DeepThink in anterior cruciate ligament surgery patient education: ChatGPT-4o excels in comprehensiveness, DeepSeek R1 leads in clarity and readability of orthopaedic information.评估DeepResearch和DeepThink在前交叉韧带手术患者教育中的作用:ChatGPT-4o在全面性方面表现出色,DeepSeek R1在骨科信息的清晰度和可读性方面领先。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jun 1. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12711.
3
Evaluating ChatGPT and DeepSeek in postdural puncture headache management: a comparative study with international consensus guidelines.评估ChatGPT和DeepSeek在硬膜穿刺后头痛管理中的应用:与国际共识指南的对比研究
BMC Neurol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04280-8.
4
How Well Do Different AI Language Models Inform Patients About Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Veins?不同的人工智能语言模型在向患者介绍静脉曲张的射频消融治疗方面效果如何?
Cureus. 2025 Jun 22;17(6):e86537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86537. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Who Knows Anatomy Best? A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-4o, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude.谁最了解解剖学?ChatGPT-4o、DeepSeek、Gemini和Claude的比较研究
Clin Anat. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1002/ca.70012.
6
Evaluating AI-Generated Patient Education Guides: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Deepseek.评估人工智能生成的患者教育指南:ChatGPT与豆包的比较研究。 需注意,原文中是ChatGPT和Deepseek,你提供的原文有误,我按照正确的Deepseek进行了翻译,若实际需求是其他,请告知。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85277. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Are clinical improvements in large language models a reality? Longitudinal comparisons of ChatGPT models and DeepSeek-R1 for psychiatric assessments and interventions.大语言模型在临床上的改进成为现实了吗?ChatGPT模型与DeepSeek-R1在精神科评估与干预方面的纵向比较。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 31:207640251358071. doi: 10.1177/00207640251358071.
8
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease Education: A Battle Between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.外周动脉疾病教育中的人工智能:ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的较量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85174. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
ChatGPT-4o vs. oncologists in addressing endometrial cancer patient inquiries: A prospective comparative study in primary and secondary care.ChatGPT-4o与肿瘤学家在解答子宫内膜癌患者疑问方面的比较:一项在初级和二级医疗保健机构中的前瞻性对比研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Aug;77:102930. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102930. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
10
Diagnostic Performance of ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-3 Differential Diagnosis of Complex Oral Lesions: A Multimodal Imaging and Case Difficulty Analysis.ChatGPT-4o和DeepSeek-3对复杂口腔病变的鉴别诊断性能:多模态成像与病例难度分析
Oral Dis. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1111/odi.70007.