Chen Yongjia, Sun Yannan, Li Xize, Lin Yijun, He Peijue, Wang Qian
Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 31;26(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09017-9.
BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), a chronic musculoskeletal disorder characterized by myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), causes localized pain and dysfunction. The objective is to compare the immediate therapeutic effects of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) versus low-intensity planar ultrasound (LIPU) on pain and function in upper trapezius MPS. METHOD: This study was designed as a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. The patients (20 ≤ aged ≤ 70) diagnosed with MPS of the upper trapezius were randomly allocated to either LIFU (study group; n = 20; 9 men, 11 women) or LIPU (control group; n = 20; 15 men, 5 women) treatments (1.5 W/cm, 1 MHz, 5 min, once a day, 3 days). The primary outcome was pain severity, assessed immediately post-treatment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0 ~ 10 cm), and served as the central efficacy endpoint. Secondary outcomes comprised supplemental assessments including: (1) multidimensional pain characterization via the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ); (2) functional disability quantification through the Neck Disability Index (NDI); and (3) neuromuscular biomarkers measured by surface electromyography (sEMG) parameters (root mean square [RMS], median frequency [MF]). The outcomes were assessed before treatment and 10 min, 72 h after completing the third and final session of treatment. RESULTS: Pain intensity, as measured by the VAS, decreased significantly immediately after treatment in both the LIFU group (median difference [MD] = -2.0 cm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.5 to -1.5 cm; p = 0.002) and the LIPU group (MD = -1.0 cm; 95% CI: -1.5 to -0.5 cm; p = 0.001), with these reductions maintained at 72 h post-treatment. Both SF-MPQ and NDI scores showed significant improvements following treatment in both groups. A significant reduction in RMS parameters was observed in the LIPU group immediately after treatment (MD = -15.3 µV; 95% CI: -20.0 to -10.5 µV; p = 0.028). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of pain alleviation, functional improvement, and alterations in neuromuscular electrophysiological activity (p > 0.05); however, moderate to large effect sizes suggest possible clinical relevance. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Both LIFU and LIPU can be considered effective therapeutic options, offering immediate symptom relief in patients with upper trapezius MPS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2500097431) as a clinical trial on 19/02/2025 http://www.chictr.org.cn/ .
背景:肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是一种以肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)为特征的慢性肌肉骨骼疾病,可导致局部疼痛和功能障碍。目的是比较低强度聚焦超声(LIFU)与低强度平面超声(LIPU)对上斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛和功能的即时治疗效果。 方法:本研究设计为单盲随机对照试验。将诊断为上斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征的患者(年龄20≤年龄≤70岁)随机分为LIFU组(研究组;n = 20;9名男性,11名女性)或LIPU组(对照组;n = 20;15名男性,5名女性)进行治疗(1.5W/cm,1MHz,5分钟,每天一次,共3天)。主要结局是疼痛严重程度,在治疗后立即使用视觉模拟量表(VAS;0~10cm)进行评估,并作为主要疗效终点。次要结局包括补充评估:(1)通过简式麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)进行多维疼痛特征分析;(2)通过颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)进行功能障碍量化;(3)通过表面肌电图(sEMG)参数(均方根[RMS]、中位频率[MF])测量神经肌肉生物标志物。在治疗前以及完成第三次也是最后一次治疗后的10分钟、72小时评估结局。 结果:LIFU组(中位差异[MD]=-2.0cm;95%置信区间[CI]:-2.5至-1.5cm;p = 0.002)和LIPU组(MD=-1.0cm;95%CI:-1.5至-0.5cm;p = 0.001)治疗后立即通过VAS测量的疼痛强度均显著降低,这些降低在治疗后72小时仍保持。两组治疗后SF-MPQ和NDI评分均显示出显著改善。LIPU组治疗后立即观察到RMS参数显著降低(MD=-15.3μV;95%CI:-20.0至-10.5μV;p = 0.028)。两组在疼痛缓解、功能改善和神经肌肉电生理活动改变方面未观察到显著差异(p>0.05);然而,中等到大的效应量表明可能具有临床相关性。未报告不良事件。 结论:LIFU和LIPU均可被视为有效的治疗选择,可为上斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者提供即时症状缓解。 试验注册:该方案于2025年2月19日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2500097431)注册为一项临床试验http://www.chictr.org.cn/ 。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-6-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-3-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-7-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-18
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024-12-23
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2024-3
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021-11