Bahl Amit, Chilelli Andrew, Faria Rita, Rozario Nigel, Snijder Robert, Stark Sari, Merseburger Axel S
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation, Bristol, UK.
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
World J Urol. 2025 Aug 1;43(1):465. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05841-9.
This study investigated the risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) versus enzalutamide (ENZA); assessed treatments for prostate cancer (PC), focusing on corticosteroid-containing regimens; and examined comorbidities recorded in primary and secondary care.
This was a post hoc analysis of the retrospective, observational EVADE study in patients who received AA or ENZA for mCRPC. Patient characteristics at treatment initiation were described, focusing on characteristics affecting the risk of CV events, together with PC treatments in the entire PC pathway. Major CV event risk was assessed with Cox regression after adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).
Overall, 1,382 patients were included (AA: 556; ENZA: 826). After IPTW adjustment, risk of a major CV event was 65.0% higher in the AA versus the ENZA group (hazard ratio: 1.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.27, 2.14; P = 0.0001). Across the entire patient pathway, the average time on corticosteroid-containing PC regimens was 298 days versus 72 days for the AA versus ENZA group. While type 2 diabetes was less frequently reported in secondary versus primary care (59.8% vs. 94.9%), CV comorbidities were more frequently reported (87.1% vs. 84.2%).
Major CV event risk was significantly higher in the AA versus ENZA group, and the AA group had numerically greater exposure to corticosteroid-containing PC regimens over the treatment course. There were discrepancies in recording diabetes and CV comorbidities between primary and secondary care in England.
本研究调查了醋酸阿比特龙(AA)与恩杂鲁胺(ENZA)治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者时发生主要心血管(CV)事件的风险;评估了前列腺癌(PC)的治疗方法,重点关注含皮质类固醇的治疗方案;并检查了初级和二级医疗保健中记录的合并症。
这是一项对接受AA或ENZA治疗mCRPC患者的回顾性观察性EVADE研究的事后分析。描述了治疗开始时的患者特征,重点是影响CV事件风险的特征,以及整个PC治疗途径中的PC治疗方法。在采用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)进行调整后,用Cox回归评估主要CV事件风险。
总体而言,纳入了1382例患者(AA组:556例;ENZA组:826例)。经IPTW调整后,AA组发生主要CV事件的风险比ENZA组高65.0%(风险比:1.65;95%置信区间:1.27,2.14;P = 0.0001)。在整个患者治疗过程中,AA组接受含皮质类固醇PC治疗方案的平均时间为298天,而ENZA组为72天。虽然二级医疗保健中2型糖尿病的报告频率低于初级医疗保健(59.8%对94.9%),但CV合并症的报告频率更高(87.1%对84.2%)。
AA组发生主要CV事件的风险显著高于ENZA组,并且在整个治疗过程中,AA组接受含皮质类固醇PC治疗方案的次数在数值上更多。英国初级和二级医疗保健在记录糖尿病和CV合并症方面存在差异。