Brasier J E, Haley D B, Bergeron R, DeVries T J
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.3168/jds.2025-26883.
The objective of this study was to determine how training dairy heifers (first-lactation cows before their first calving) on an automated milking system (AMS) before parturition affects their adaptation and performance when milked on the AMS. Thirty pregnant Holstein dairy heifers were enrolled in the study 23 ± 5.2 d (mean ± SD) before their expected calving date in dry cow pens located away from the AMS. Heifers were paired by expected calving date and allocated into 1 of 2 treatments within pair (16 pairs initially enrolled): control (CON; no training; n = 16 heifers completed) and training (TRN; this included exposure to AMS environment, concentrate, and mechanical arm and noises; n = 14 heifers completed). The TRN heifers were trained to the AMS over 4 d, 14 ± 5.1 d before their actual calving date, with 3 training sessions/d. All heifers calved in individual maternity pens and were then moved to the free-traffic AMS pen between 3 and 7 DIM to be milked by the AMS, with a fetch pen adjacent to the entrance of the AMS. Milking activity (visits, milkings), behavior (feeding, rumination), and production were recorded for the first 21 d on the AMS. Ease of entry was scored from 0 to 6 (0 = no assistance to 6 = heavy assistance), kicking from 0 to 3 (0 = no kicking to 3 = >2 kicking events), and milk letdown from 0 to 3 (0 = normal letdown to 3 = no letdown) for the first 6 milkings on the AMS across the first 2 d. Time spent around the AMS was recorded on d 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 of milking on the AMS, while any time spent in the fetch pen was recorded for all 21 d. The TRN cows had a better (lower) ease of entry score (2.87 vs. 4.26) and milk letdown score (0.35 vs. 0.70) during the first 6 milkings. The TRN cows had more total visits to the AMS (6.1 #/d vs. 5.0 #/d), voluntary visits (5.6 #/d vs. 4.2 #/d), and voluntary milkings (2.6 #/d vs. 2.2 #/d) on the AMS across the 21-d period, compared with CON cows. The CON cows had more fetches (1.0 #/d vs. 0.8 #/d) to the AMS across the 21-d period and spent more time in the fetch pen (18.7 min/d vs. 14.6 min/d) compared with TRN cows. The improved adaptation for TRN cows may have contributed to a higher milk yield (32.8 kg/d vs. 30.6) compared with CON cows. Overall, these results demonstrate that training before calving improved adaptation and performance of cows milked on an AMS compared with cows without previous exposure to the AMS, and its concentrate and mechanics exposure within, before their first AMS milking.
本研究的目的是确定在分娩前对初产奶牛(首次产犊前的头胎奶牛)进行自动挤奶系统(AMS)训练,对其在AMS上挤奶时的适应性和生产性能有何影响。30头怀孕的荷斯坦奶牛在预计产犊日期前23±5.2天(平均值±标准差)被纳入研究,安置在远离AMS的干奶牛舍中。奶牛按预计产犊日期配对,并在每对中分配到两种处理之一(最初纳入16对):对照组(CON;不训练;n = 16头奶牛完成实验)和训练组(TRN;包括接触AMS环境、精饲料、机械臂和噪音;n = 14头奶牛完成实验)。TRN组奶牛在实际产犊日期前14±5.1天,用4天时间进行AMS训练,每天训练3次。所有奶牛在单独的产房产犊,然后在产犊后3至7天转移到自由通行的AMS牛舍,由AMS挤奶,AMS入口处相邻有一个待取牛舍。在AMS上挤奶的前21天记录挤奶活动(访问次数、挤奶次数)、行为(采食、反刍)和产量。在AMS上挤奶的头2天,对前6次挤奶的进入难易程度从0到6评分(0 = 无需协助至?6 = 大力协助),踢腿情况从0到3评分(0 = 无踢腿至3 = 超过2次踢腿事件),以及排乳情况从0到3评分(0 = 正常排乳至3 = 无排乳)。在AMS上挤奶的第1、3、7、14和21天记录在AMS周围停留的时间,而在整个21天记录在待取牛舍中停留的任何时间。TRN组奶牛在前6次挤奶时进入难易程度评分更好(更低)(2.87对4.26)和排乳评分(0.35对0.70)。在21天的时间段内,与CON组奶牛相比,TRN组奶牛对AMS的总访问次数更多(6.1次/天对5.0次/天)、自主访问次数更多(5.6次/天对4.2次/天)以及自主挤奶次数更多(2.6次/天对2.2次/天)。在21天的时间段内,与TRN组奶牛相比,CON组奶牛到AMS的待取次数更多(1.0次/天对0.8次/天),并且在待取牛舍中停留的时间更长(18.7分钟/天对14.6分钟/天)。与CON组奶牛相比,TRN组奶牛更好的适应性可能促成了更高的产奶量(32.8千克/天对30.6千克/天)。总体而言,这些结果表明,与首次在AMS上挤奶前未接触过AMS及其内部精饲料和机械装置的奶牛相比,产犊前进行训练可提高奶牛在AMS上挤奶时的适应性和生产性能。