Bhatt Manini, Das Bodhisatwa
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Ropar, Punjab 140001, India.
ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025 Aug 18;8(8):6526-6540. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.5c00459. Epub 2025 Aug 3.
Spinal cord injuries, whether resulting from traumatic or nontraumatic events, have severe and lasting detrimental effects on individuals, significantly impacting their overall health, mobility, and quality of life. The limited regenerative capacity of the spinal cord is mainly due to neuronal damage, the presence of inhibitory molecules, an impaired immune response, and the formation of glial scars, all of which create a hostile environment for neural repair and functional recovery. The majority of SCIs are caused by traffic accidents and falling objects. The current global treatments used for SCI are surgical methods, steroid medications, physiotherapy, and spinal cord epidural stimulations. However, these approaches offer only temporary relief and have serious adverse effects. Various preclinical approaches have been studied for SCI, including biomaterials, drug delivery, electrical stimulation, and cell-based therapies. Among these, stem cell therapies, such as NSCs, MSCs, and iPSCs, have the potential to significantly improve axonal regrowth, reduce inflammation, and promote neuroprotection. Furthermore, biophysical stimulation methods such as optogenetics, electrical and mechanical stimulation, and biomechanical devices offer encouraging paths toward improving neural plasticity and functional recovery. However, combinational approaches such as biomaterials with cell-based systems, cell-based systems with drug delivery, and biophysical stimulation with biomaterials aim to have more significant potential for functional recovery than a single treatment alone. This review has discussed the current clinical practices for SCI treatment, their limitations, and combinational strategies for spinal cord regeneration. So, this article can give clinicians, bioengineers, and researchers clues to construct preclinical and clinical studies that can have long-term effects on patients.
脊髓损伤,无论由创伤性或非创伤性事件引起,都会对个体产生严重且持久的有害影响,显著影响其整体健康、活动能力和生活质量。脊髓有限的再生能力主要归因于神经元损伤、抑制性分子的存在、免疫反应受损以及胶质瘢痕的形成,所有这些都为神经修复和功能恢复创造了不利环境。大多数脊髓损伤是由交通事故和高空坠物引起的。目前全球用于脊髓损伤的治疗方法有手术方法、类固醇药物、物理治疗和脊髓硬膜外刺激。然而,这些方法只能提供暂时缓解,且有严重的副作用。针对脊髓损伤已经研究了各种临床前方法,包括生物材料、药物递送、电刺激和基于细胞的疗法。其中,干细胞疗法,如神经干细胞、间充质干细胞和诱导多能干细胞,有可能显著促进轴突再生、减轻炎症并促进神经保护。此外,光遗传学、电刺激和机械刺激以及生物力学装置等生物物理刺激方法为改善神经可塑性和功能恢复提供了令人鼓舞的途径。然而,生物材料与基于细胞的系统、基于细胞的系统与药物递送以及生物物理刺激与生物材料等联合方法,相比于单一治疗,在功能恢复方面具有更大的潜力。本综述讨论了脊髓损伤治疗的当前临床实践、其局限性以及脊髓再生的联合策略。因此,本文可为临床医生、生物工程师和研究人员提供线索,以构建对患者可能产生长期影响的临床前和临床研究。