一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究

A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.

作者信息

Bucci Sandra, Varese Filippo, Quayle Ethel, Cartwright Kim, Larkin Amanda, Chan Cindy, Chitsabesan Prathiba, Green Victoria, Hewins William, Machin Matthew, Newton Alice, Niebauer Erica, Norrie John, Radford Gillian, Richards Cathy, Sandys Marina, Selby Victoria, Shafi Sara, Ward Jennifer, Whelan Pauline, Schwannauer Matthias

机构信息

Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No evidence-based support for young people who have experienced technology-assisted sexual abuse exists. The project's aims were to develop a digital intervention that improves mentalisation (the ability to understand the minds of oneself and others that underlies behaviour) to reduce the risk for revictimisation and future harm and improve young people's resilience.

OBJECTIVES

To co-design a mentalisation-based digital intervention; determine its feasibility, acceptability, safety and usability; and determine how to best integrate this into practice.

METHODS

A mixed-methods, non-randomised study in young people aged 12-18 years exposed to technology-assisted sexual abuse across two United Kingdom sites. We adapted an existing mentalisation-based therapy manual and co-designed a digital health intervention (app) using participatory methods. Recommendations from our pre-trial qualitative work with healthcare professionals supporting young people with technology-assisted sexual abuse and lived experience consultation informed app development and trial procedures. The primary outcome was the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the digital intervention measured against relevant fields of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for feasibility studies. Intervention safety was reported against an adverse events procedure. Usability was guided by the framework for analysing and measuring usage and engagement data in digital interventions. Acceptability was examined using qualitative methods. The planned sample size of the feasibility clinical trial was 60 young people.

RESULTS

Between May 2022 and March 2023, 147 young people were screened for eligibility for the feasibility clinical trial; 72 referrals were made and 43 young people were allocated to receive the intervention. We found that it was possible to recruit and retain participants to this trial. Quantitative and qualitative data showed that the i-Minds app was safe, acceptable and associated with promising signals of efficacy on valuable outcomes post treatment, including technology-assisted-sexual-abuse-related post-traumatic symptoms, resilience, internalising symptoms and reflective functioning. Most participants accessed or completed app modules. User feedback indicated that participants had a positive experience using the app, positively increasing their knowledge/understanding of their own mental health and their motivation to address their mental health difficulties. Practitioners identified the barriers to implementing i-Minds into routine practice as not being involved in its design at the outset, possible impact on workload and whether digital health interventions might replace routine care. Facilitators included the distinct nature and specificity of the i-Minds app for the target group and its ability to support young people on service waiting lists.

LIMITATIONS

There was limited ethnic diversity in the samples, reflecting potential selection bias at the referral point. Sexual orientation is not reported in the trial. The trial lacked randomisation and a control group, limiting interpretation of post-treatment improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

A mentalisation-based digital intervention is feasible, acceptable and safe. A larger-scale evaluation appears warranted. Further service improvements are required for routine assessment and support for young people experiencing technology-assisted sexual abuse.

FUTURE WORK

Further questions could be explored, including evaluating training materials for online harms, developing guidelines assessing for and responding to online harms, validated measures to assess for online harms, understanding further where digital health interventions fit along the clinical care pathway, recruiting a more diverse sample, and further differentiating the forms of online harms and their consequences.

FUNDING

This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR131848.

摘要

背景

对于经历过技术辅助性虐待的年轻人,目前尚无基于证据的支持措施。该项目的目标是开发一种数字干预措施,以提高心理化能力(理解自身和他人心理从而指导行为的能力),降低再次受害和未来受到伤害的风险,并增强年轻人的恢复力。

目的

共同设计一种基于心理化的数字干预措施;确定其可行性、可接受性、安全性和可用性;并确定如何将其最佳地融入实践。

方法

在英国的两个地点,对12至18岁经历过技术辅助性虐待的年轻人进行了一项混合方法、非随机研究。我们改编了现有的基于心理化治疗的手册,并采用参与式方法共同设计了一种数字健康干预措施(应用程序)。我们在审判前与支持经历技术辅助性虐待的年轻人的医疗保健专业人员进行的定性研究以及实际经验咨询中获得的建议,为应用程序的开发和试验程序提供了参考。主要结果是根据可行性研究报告试验综合标准的相关领域衡量数字干预措施的可行性和可接受性。根据不良事件程序报告干预措施的安全性。可用性以分析和测量数字干预措施中的使用情况和参与数据的框架为指导。使用定性方法检查可接受性。可行性临床试验的计划样本量为60名年轻人。

结果

在2022年5月至2023年3月期间,对147名年轻人进行了可行性临床试验资格筛查;进行了72次转诊,43名年轻人被分配接受干预。我们发现招募和留住该试验的参与者是可行的。定量和定性数据表明,i-Minds应用程序是安全的、可接受的,并且与治疗后有价值结果(包括与技术辅助性虐待相关的创伤后症状、恢复力、内化症状和反思功能)的有效信号相关。大多数参与者访问或完成了应用程序模块。用户反馈表明,参与者使用该应用程序有积极体验,积极提高了他们对自身心理健康的知识/理解以及解决心理健康问题的动力。从业者确定将i-Minds应用程序纳入常规实践的障碍包括一开始未参与其设计、可能对工作量的影响以及数字健康干预措施是否可能取代常规护理。促进因素包括i-Minds应用程序针对目标群体的独特性质和特异性及其支持处于服务等候名单上的年轻人的能力。

局限性

样本中的种族多样性有限,反映出转诊点可能存在选择偏差。试验中未报告性取向。该试验缺乏随机分组和对照组,限制了对治疗后改善情况的解释。

结论

基于心理化的数字干预措施是可行的、可接受的和安全的。似乎有必要进行更大规模的评估。对于经历技术辅助性虐待的年轻人的常规评估和支持,还需要进一步改进服务。

未来工作

可以探索进一步的问题,包括评估在线伤害的培训材料、制定评估和应对在线伤害的指南、评估在线伤害的有效措施、进一步了解数字健康干预措施在临床护理路径中的位置、招募更多样化的样本,以及进一步区分在线伤害的形式及其后果。

资金

本摘要介绍了由英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生与社会保健交付研究计划资助的独立研究,资助编号为NIHR131848。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索