• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维虚拟手术规划在骶髂关节融合中的作用。

The effect of 3D virtual surgical planning in sacroiliac joint fusion.

作者信息

Kampkuiper Nick, Abkar Asal, Nellensteijn Jorm, Brusse-Keizer Marjolein, Tuijthof Gabriëlle, Koenrades Maaike, Schröder Femke

机构信息

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Medical 3D lab, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 22;5:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104334. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2025.104334
PMID:40755841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318284/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac (SI) dysfunction causes of up to 30 % of lower back pain. When conservative treatment is insufficient, SI joint fusion (SIJF) can be indicated to reduce pain. Due to high anatomical variability, poor visibility during intraoperative 2D fluoroscopic imaging, and the absence of 3D spatial information, placing the implant in a stable configuration without damaging critical structures is challenging. To improve patient outcomes, a virtual surgical planning (VSP) method using simulated fluoroscopic images has been developed.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the effect of VSP on patient outcomes, including complications, pain scores, satisfaction scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores?

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study compared procedures performed with VSP to those conducted prior to its implementation. Data were collected from the medical records, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) questions, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). All postoperative CT scans were assessed on implant placement (mal)positioning and fractures. Malposition complications were categorized as severe malposition and suboptimal implant placement.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight procedures were included, 43 in the VSP group and 35 in the conventional group. Severe malposition complications reduced from 9 % to 0 % after VSP was implemented. Suboptimal implant placement reduced from 46 % to 9 % of the interventions. Sacral fractures reduced from 37 % to 14 %. All other primary outcome measures did not show a significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

VSP in SIJF reduced implant malpositioning and sacral fractures. This can lead to better patient outcomes. A larger multicenter study is needed to explore the broader impact of VSP on SIJF.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节功能障碍导致高达30%的下背部疼痛。当保守治疗无效时,可考虑进行骶髂关节融合术(SIJF)以减轻疼痛。由于解剖变异大、术中二维透视成像时视野不佳以及缺乏三维空间信息,在不损伤关键结构的情况下将植入物放置在稳定的位置具有挑战性。为改善患者预后,已开发出一种使用模拟透视图像的虚拟手术规划(VSP)方法。

研究问题

VSP对患者预后的影响如何,包括并发症、疼痛评分、满意度评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分?

方法

这项回顾性病例对照研究将采用VSP进行的手术与实施VSP之前进行的手术进行了比较。数据从医疗记录、数字评分量表(NRS)问题以及患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)中收集。所有术后CT扫描均评估植入物的放置(错)位置和骨折情况。位置不当并发症分为严重位置不当和植入物放置欠佳。

结果

共纳入78例手术,VSP组43例,传统组35例。实施VSP后,严重位置不当并发症从9%降至0%。植入物放置欠佳在干预中从46%降至9%。骶骨骨折从37%降至14%。所有其他主要结局指标在两组之间未显示出显著差异。

结论

SIJF中的VSP减少了植入物位置不当和骶骨骨折。这可带来更好的患者预后。需要开展更大规模的多中心研究来探索VSP对SIJF的更广泛影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/3be1a70c6ef9/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/f64ea9875855/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/db3e14906e18/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/ac1b64841298/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/b6f63e2f888a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/3be1a70c6ef9/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/f64ea9875855/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/db3e14906e18/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/ac1b64841298/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/b6f63e2f888a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b8/12318284/3be1a70c6ef9/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of 3D virtual surgical planning in sacroiliac joint fusion.三维虚拟手术规划在骶髂关节融合中的作用。
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 22;5:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104334. eCollection 2025.
2
The Bedrock technique with triangular titanium rods for spinopelvic fixation and sacroiliac joint fusion: is there a learning curve?采用三角形钛棒进行脊柱骨盆固定和骶髂关节融合的基岩技术:是否存在学习曲线?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jul 23;35(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04431-0.
3
What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?膝关节弥漫型腱鞘巨细胞瘤患者行多入路关节镜下滑膜切除术的复发率、并发症及功能结局如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1218-1229. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002934. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications.肿瘤Ⅱ型骨盆切除术后采用同种异体骨移植加全髋关节置换术进行复合重建是可行的,但并发症多。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003097. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
5
What Is the Functional Spinopelvic Relationship in Three Dimensions? A CT and EOS Study.三维空间中功能性脊柱骨盆关系是什么?一项CT和EOS研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003473.
6
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗慢性骶髂关节痛:系统评价。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Does Resilience Change in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery? A Retrospective Comparative Study Utilizing the Brief Resilience Scale.接受肩部手术的患者的心理韧性会发生变化吗?一项使用简易心理韧性量表的回顾性比较研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1049-1059. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003368. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
8
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
9
Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜时代的髋关节脱位手术具有高存活率,并改善了复杂型股骨髋臼撞击症患者的报告结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1671-1682. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003032. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
10
A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis of a Novel Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Device on Safety and Efficacy at 12 Months: Access Study.一项关于新型骶髂关节融合装置12个月安全性和有效性的回顾性多中心分析:ACCESS研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 28;13(13):1544. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131544.

本文引用的文献

1
Sacroiliac joint fusion guided by intraoperatively superimposed virtual surgical planning using simulated fluoroscopic images.使用模拟荧光透视图像的术中叠加虚拟手术规划引导下的骶髂关节融合术。
Brain Spine. 2024 Aug 2;4:102905. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102905. eCollection 2024.
2
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
3
Intraoperative Navigation in Spine Surgery: Effects on Complications and Reoperations.
脊柱手术中的术中导航:对并发症和再次手术的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:e404-e411. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.035. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Biomechanical Stability of the Sacroiliac Joint with Differing Implant Configurations in a Synthetic Model.在合成模型中不同植入物配置下骶髂关节的生物力学稳定性
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):853-861. doi: 10.14444/8117. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
5
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.骶髂关节功能紊乱:病理生理学、诊断与治疗。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Oct;30(10):2936-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06927-9. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants.使用3D打印三角形钛植入物进行骶髂关节融合的前瞻性试验。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2020 Jun 16;13:173-182. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S253741. eCollection 2020.
7
The Safety Profile of Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.经皮微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性概况
Global Spine J. 2019 Dec;9(8):874-880. doi: 10.1177/2192568218816981. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants.使用三角形钛植入物进行微创经髂骨外侧骶髂关节融合术后的长期前瞻性临床和影像学结果
Med Devices (Auckl). 2019 Sep 26;12:411-422. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S219862. eCollection 2019.
9
Interactive virtual 3D models of renal cancer patient anatomies alter partial nephrectomy surgical planning decisions and increase surgeon confidence compared to volume-rendered images.与容积再现图像相比,肾癌患者解剖的交互式虚拟 3D 模型改变了部分肾切除术的手术计划决策,并增加了外科医生的信心。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Apr;14(4):723-732. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-01913-5. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Postmarket surveillance of 3D-printed implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.3D打印骶髂关节融合植入物的上市后监测。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Sep 28;11:337-343. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S180958. eCollection 2018.