Suppr超能文献

卵巢早衰的穴位刺激方法:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析

Acupoint stimulation methods for premature ovarian insufficiency: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Du Zhenping, Ye Guancheng, Wei Jingyuan, Li Shutong, Zhao Shan, Wang Jun

机构信息

Department of Acupuncture, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Department of Rheumatology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 18;16:1604563. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1604563. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate and rank the efficacy of different acupoint stimulation (AS) therapies in the treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) by network meta-analysis (NMA) and to explore the optimal AS regimen for improving sex hormone levels and clinical symptoms.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English and Chinese up to November 2024 were searched in eight databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Included studies were patients with POI diagnosed according to established international or Chinese guidelines. The intervention compared AS therapies (e.g., acupuncture, moxibustion, and electroacupuncture) with conventional treatments (oral herbs or hormone replacement therapy) or/and placebo. Outcome indicators included antral follicle count (AFC), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, estradiol (E) levels, and Kupperman scores. The outcome indicators were evaluated on days 2-5 of the menstrual period. Exclusion criteria included non-RCTs, duplicate publications, non-peer-reviewed literature, studies with unclear outcome/baseline data, studies with a non-POI diagnosis, studies with a before-and-after own-control design, non-human studies, and studies with missing continuous data. Literature quality and risk of bias were assessed using Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.3. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software, mvmeta package, and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of 51 RCTs were retrieved, including 3,754 patients. A methodological assessment of 51 RCTs revealed generalized risks: 9.8% of RCTs used incorrect randomization methods; 29% of RCTs did not describe explicit randomization; all RCTs did not have explicit allocation concealment; 98% of RCTs did not mention blinding; all RCTs reported complete outcome data; and 98% of RCTs had unclear risks. Therapies combining multiple AS therapies (especially moxibustion-related therapies) improved ovarian function significantly. Acupuncture combined with moxibustion (Acu + Moxi) was effective in increasing AFC [mean difference (MD) = 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.31, 2.77); SUCRA = 75.1%]. Auricular seed therapy (AST) was most effective in reducing FSH [MD = 3.03, 95% CI (0.45, 5.60); SUCRA = 83.7%]. Acupuncture (Acu) was effective in reducing LH levels [MD = 1.52, 95% CI (0.27, 2.77); SUCRA = 58.3%]. Moxibustion combined with tuina (Moxi + MT) [MD = 11.92, 95% CI (8.19, 15.65); SUCRA = 100%] and moxibustion combined with acupressure [MD = 3.20, 95% CI (0.16, 6.24); SUCRA = 81.4%] significantly increased E levels. Moxibustion combined with tuina (Moxi + MT) had the best effect on Kupperman score improvement [MD = 4.63, 95% CI (0.58, 8.68); SUCRA = 92.1%]. Adverse events for all therapies involved in this study were mild and resolved with symptomatic management.

CONCLUSION

AS therapies (especially those combined with moxibustion) can safely and effectively improve hormone levels and clinical symptoms in patients with POI, supporting their clinical application as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024612169.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过网状Meta分析(NMA)评估不同穴位刺激(AS)疗法治疗卵巢早衰(POI)的疗效并进行排序,并探索改善性激素水平和临床症状的最佳AS方案。

方法

截至2024年11月,在包括Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和中国知网(CNKI)在内的8个数据库中检索中英文随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入的研究为根据既定的国际或中国指南诊断为POI的患者。干预措施将AS疗法(如针灸、艾灸和电针)与传统治疗(口服草药或激素替代疗法)或/和安慰剂进行比较。结局指标包括窦卵泡计数(AFC)、促卵泡生成素(FSH)水平、促黄体生成素(LH)水平、雌二醇(E)水平和库珀曼评分。在月经周期的第2 - 5天评估结局指标。排除标准包括非RCT、重复发表、非同行评审文献、结局/基线数据不明确的研究、非POI诊断的研究、自身前后对照设计的研究、非人体研究以及连续数据缺失的研究。使用Review Manager(RevMan)5.3版评估文献质量和偏倚风险。使用Stata 16.0软件、mvmeta包和累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)进行统计分析。

结果

共检索到51项RCT,包括3754例患者。对51项RCT的方法学评估显示存在普遍风险:9.8%的RCT使用了不正确的随机化方法;29%的RCT未描述明确的随机化;所有RCT均未进行明确的分配隐藏;98%的RCT未提及盲法;所有RCT均报告了完整的结局数据;98%的RCT风险不明确。多种AS疗法联合使用(尤其是与艾灸相关的疗法)能显著改善卵巢功能。针灸联合艾灸(Acu + Moxi)可有效增加AFC[平均差(MD)= 2.04,95%置信区间(CI)(1.31,2.77);SUCRA = 75.1%]。耳穴压豆疗法(AST)在降低FSH方面最有效[MD = 3.03,95% CI(0.45,5.60);SUCRA = 83.7%]。针灸(Acu)可有效降低LH水平[MD = 1.52,95% CI(0.27,2.77);SUCRA = 58.3%]。艾灸联合推拿(Moxi + MT)[MD = 11.92,95% CI(8.19,15.65);SUCRA = 100%]和艾灸联合指压[MD = 3.20,95% CI(0.16,6.24);SUCRA = 81.4%]可显著提高E水平。艾灸联合推拿(Moxi + MT)在改善库珀曼评分方面效果最佳[MD = 4.63,95% CI(0.58,8.68);SUCRA = 92.1%]。本研究中所有疗法的不良事件均较轻,经对症处理后缓解。

结论

AS疗法(尤其是与艾灸联合的疗法)可安全有效地改善POI患者的激素水平和临床症状,支持其作为补充和替代医学(CAM)的临床应用。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42024612169。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c3/12313507/b881579871b0/fendo-16-1604563-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验