• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3个月以下新生儿达芬奇机器人辅助肾盂成形术与腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较

Da Vinci robotic assisted pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty in newborns under 3 months.

作者信息

Shu Boshen, Zhang Shufeng, Gao Jian, Wang Lin, Wang Shuangshuang, Shi Ruoyi, Wang Xiaohui

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan Province, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14603-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-14603-x
PMID:40760161
Abstract

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a common cause of hydronephrosis in children. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in newborns with UPJO compared to laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). We conducted a retrospective study of newborns aged ≤ 3 months who underwent RALP or LP from May 2018 to December 2023. Only primary pyeloplasty cases were included. Seventy-seven newborns (RALP = 46; LP = 31) were enrolled and no significant difference in the newborns' demographics and pre-operative parameters was found. The mean operation time (OT) was 161.30 ± 29.07 min (RALP) and 200.60 ± 26.66 min (LP) (P < 0.0001), and the mean hospitalization stay was 7.80 ± 1.13 days (RALP) and 9.32 ± 1.19 days (LP) (P < 0.0001). RALP was associated with a higher hospitalization cost than LP (73449 ± 8513 yuan vs. 40152 ± 7555 yuan; P < 0.0001). The effectiveness and safety of RALP for treating UPJO in newborns is comparable to that of LP. In addition, RALP might have advantages over LP with its faster recovery and less trauma.

摘要

肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻(UPJO)是儿童肾积水的常见原因。我们旨在研究机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALP)与腹腔镜肾盂成形术(LP)相比,在新生儿UPJO治疗中的疗效。我们对2018年5月至2023年12月期间接受RALP或LP手术的3个月及以下新生儿进行了一项回顾性研究。仅纳入初次肾盂成形术病例。共纳入77例新生儿(RALP组46例;LP组31例),新生儿的人口统计学特征和术前参数无显著差异。平均手术时间(OT)为161.30±29.07分钟(RALP组)和200.60±26.66分钟(LP组)(P<0.0001),平均住院时间为7.80±1.13天(RALP组)和9.32±1.19天(LP组)(P<0.0001)。RALP的住院费用高于LP(73449±8513元 vs. 40152±7555元;P<0.0001)。RALP治疗新生儿UPJO的有效性和安全性与LP相当。此外,RALP可能在恢复更快和创伤更小方面优于LP。

相似文献

1
Da Vinci robotic assisted pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty in newborns under 3 months.3个月以下新生儿达芬奇机器人辅助肾盂成形术与腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14603-x.
2
Comparison of the treatment effect of laparoscopic and robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty on ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants.腹腔镜与机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗婴儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的疗效比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 6;19(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02528-6.
3
Comparative outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: a decade of evidence.小儿患者机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较结果:十年证据
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 30;19(1):436. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02618-5.
4
A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.对儿童复发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻行再次肾盂成形术的开放手术、传统腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Oct;18(5):642-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
5
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and age-stratified outcomes.小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术:疗效、安全性及年龄分层结局的Meta分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 2;19(1):443. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02621-w.
6
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗儿童肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO):技术考虑和结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):667.e1-667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty using the Da Vinci Si and Xi surgical systems.使用达芬奇Si和Xi手术系统进行小儿机器人肾盂成形术的围手术期结果及成本比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.07.022.
8
Has robot-assisted pyeloplasty reached outcome parity with laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children <15 kg? A Paediatric YAU international multi-center study.机器人辅助肾盂成形术在体重<15kg 的儿童中与腹腔镜肾盂成形术的结局是否具有可比性?一项儿科 YAU 国际多中心研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Dec;20(6):1154-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
9
Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助肾盂成形术在儿童中的应用:文献系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.从腹腔镜肾盂成形术到机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术用于儿童输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的初次及再次修复手术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Aug;28(8):1012-1018. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0561. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术在儿童中的学习曲线。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 28;18(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01856-3.
2
The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Sep 6;39(1):265. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05541-8.
3
The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: a systematic review.
泌尿外科主要腹腔镜和机器人手术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2037-2057. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345.
4
Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young children.婴幼儿腹腔镜肾盂成形术与机器人辅助肾盂成形术的比较
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):868-873. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.046. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery-A Bibliometric Study on 30 Years of Research Activity.小儿微创手术——一项关于30年研究活动的文献计量学研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 21;9(8):1264. doi: 10.3390/children9081264.
6
Robotics and future technical developments in pediatric urology.机器人技术和小儿外科学的未来技术发展。
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2021 Aug;30(4):151082. doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2021.151082. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术与传统腹腔镜手术的安全性、有效性及手术结果比较
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Nov 10;12:555-562. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S238823. eCollection 2020.
8
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术在婴儿和儿童中的应用:是否优于传统腹腔镜?
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: preliminary results of a pilot prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与机器人辅助肾盂成形术治疗儿童肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:一项初步前瞻性随机对照试验的结果。
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1841-1848. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02910-8. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Robotic surgery in infants and children: an argument for smaller and fewer incisions.机器人手术在婴幼儿中的应用:更小切口和更少数量切口的理由。
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1835-1840. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02765-z. Epub 2019 Apr 23.