文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Health-related quality of life and performance status with NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results from the NAPOLI 3 trial.

作者信息

Melisi D, Macarulla T, De La Fouchardière C, Pazo Cid R A, Chandana S R, Kiss I, Lee W J, Goetze T O, Van Cutsem E, Paulson A S, Bekaii-Saab T, Pant S, Hubner R A, Maxwell F, Zhang L, Benzaghou F, O'Reilly E M, Wainberg Z A

机构信息

Investigational Cancer Therapeutics Clinical Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy; Digestive Molecular Clinical Oncology Research Unit, Università degli studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.

Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

ESMO Open. 2025 Aug;10(8):105534. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105534. Epub 2025 Aug 5.


DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105534
PMID:40763412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12345255/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: In NAPOLI 3 (NCT04083235), first-line (1L) liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival compared with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (Gem + NabP) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). In this exploratory analysis, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and performance status (PS) outcomes from NAPOLI 3 were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HRQoL was assessed at baseline, day 1 of each treatment cycle, and at end of treatment (EoT) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Analyses included patients who provided baseline and at least one subsequent assessment. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to describe score evolution over time between treatment arms. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS was recorded in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population at baseline, days 1, 8, and 15 of each treatment cycle, and EoT. Time to deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-C30 and ECOG PS scores was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: Overall, 245 patients in the NALIRIFOX arm (ITT population, n = 383) and 232 patients in the Gem + NabP arm (n = 387) provided baseline and at least one subsequent EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. There was an initial decline in global health status (GHS) from baseline to week 12 across both treatment arms [least-squares mean -2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.9 to 1.1; Gem + NabP: -0.7 (-4.2 to 2.9)], with no further deterioration from week 16 onwards. TTD in GHS (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.53-1.04, nominal P = 0.08) and ECOG PS score (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.92, nominal P = 0.009) was longer with NALIRIFOX than with Gem + NabP. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that 1L NALIRIFOX provides efficacy benefits for patients with mPDAC without compromising HRQoL or PS compared with Gem + NabP.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/310320d8755d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/c785a28a3e05/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/773bb86b722a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/8b0bbd35af0a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/310320d8755d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/c785a28a3e05/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/773bb86b722a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/8b0bbd35af0a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e54/12345255/310320d8755d/gr4.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Health-related quality of life and performance status with NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results from the NAPOLI 3 trial.

ESMO Open. 2025-8

[2]
NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and Gemcitabine With Nab-Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA Netw Open. 2024-1-2

[3]
Comparison of first-line chemotherapy regimens in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Lancet Oncol. 2024-12

[4]
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-5

[5]
Cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX versus Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2025-4-17

[6]
Alternating gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone versus continuous gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel after induction treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (ALPACA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-10

[7]
Comparative Outcomes of First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Among the Regimens Used in Japan: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-1-4

[8]
Real-World Analysis of the Correlation between Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Results of NAPOLEON-1 and 2 Studies.

Oncology. 2025

[9]
Comparison of the Efficacy of Nal-IRI+5FU/LV and S-1 in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel.

Oncology. 2024-12-20

[10]
HALO 202: Randomized Phase II Study of PEGPH20 Plus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine Versus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine in Patients With Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

J Clin Oncol. 2017-12-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1b/2 Trial of Nabpaclitaxel + Gemcitabine ± Olaratumab in Treatment-Naïve Participants with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-3-28

[2]
Integration of liposomal irinotecan in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: try to do not think about the white bear.

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024-4-4

[3]
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2024

[4]
NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and Gemcitabine With Nab-Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA Netw Open. 2024-1-2

[5]
Perioperative NALIRIFOX in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The open-label, multicenter, phase II nITRO trial.

Eur J Cancer. 2024-1

[6]
NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet. 2023-10-7

[7]
Minimally important differences for interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 change scores over time: A synthesis across 21 clinical trials involving nine different cancer types.

Eur J Cancer. 2023-7

[8]
Liposomal Irinotecan Shows a Larger Therapeutic Index than Non-liposomal Irinotecan in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Pancreatic Cancer.

Oncol Ther. 2023-3

[9]
Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Cancer Manag Res. 2022-12-6

[10]
Chart review of diagnostic methods, baseline characteristics and symptoms for European patients with pancreatic cancer.

Future Oncol. 2021-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索