Mider P A
Int J Addict. 1985 Aug;20(8):1191-211. doi: 10.3109/10826088509056359.
A hierarchical regression approach was used to test the hypotheses that there is a lower need for treatment for TC residents demonstrating a person-centered cognitive-perceptual style than an inanimate thing-centered one, and that thing-centered MMT patients would show a lower need for treatment than person-centered ones. The hypotheses were not confirmed. Secondary analysis shows that TC and MMT subjects do not differ for person/thing centeredness. TC subjects do show a greater overall need for treatment than MMT subjects.
与以无生命物体为中心的认知-感知风格相比,以人 为中心的认知-感知风格的治疗社区(TC)居民对治疗的需求较低;并且以物体为中心的 精神动力疗法(MMT)患者对治疗的需求会比以人为中心的患者低。这些假设未得到证实。 二次分析表明,治疗社区和精神动力疗法受试者在以人/物为中心方面没有差异。治疗社区 受试者对治疗的总体需求确实比精神动力疗法受试者更大。