Suppr超能文献

通过NeuroSpeed经皮血管成形术球囊导管部署的pEGASUS-HPC和CREDO Heal支架系统治疗急性症状性颅内狭窄和闭塞的比较。

Comparison of pEGASUS-HPC and CREDO Heal stent systems deployed via NeuroSpeed percutaneous angioplasty balloon catheter for treatment of acute symptomatic intracranial stenosis and occlusion.

作者信息

Aburub Abdallah, Almohammad Mohammad, Khanafer Ali, Ali Zakarya, Gurschi Mariana, Aghazadeh Yashar, Dadak Mete, Moher Alsady Tawfik, Timmermann Lars, Simon Ole, Gerstner Anja, Moustafa Bayan Alhaj, Dob Oussama, Nimsky Christopher, Saß Benjamin, Henkes Hans, Kemmling André

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Department of interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rhön-Klinikum, Campus Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Neuroradiol. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00062-025-01544-1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the pEGASUS-HPC and CREDO heal coated stent systems used with the NeuroSpeed percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) balloon catheter, for treating acute symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) with or without acute vessel occlusion (VO).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with ICAS between June-2021 and June-2024 treated with the NeuroSpeed PTA balloon catheter and either stent system. Clinical endpoints included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and modified ranking scores (mRS), safety and efficacy endpoints included in-stent thrombosis and in-stent stenosis.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included (pEGASUS-HPC, n = 34; CREDO heal, n = 35). Both groups showed significant improvement in arterial diameter post-intervention (pEGASUS-HPC: 0.47 mm (SD 0.27 mm) to 1.69 mm (SD 0.55 mm); CREDO heal: 0.57 mm (SD 0.41 mm) to 1.89 mm (SD 0.62 mm)). Revascularization success, defined as residual stenosis < 50%, was achieved in 32/34 (93.9%) patients in the pEGASUS-HPC group and 33/35 (94.3%) in the CREDO heal group. In-stent re-stenosis occurred in 5/34 (14.7%) of patients in the pEGASUS-HPC group and 2/35 (5.7%) in the CREDO heal group and retreatment with PTA was performed in 3/34 (8.8%) and 2/35 (5.7%), respectively. Peri- or postprocedural in-stent thrombosis occurred in 3/34 (8.8%) of patients in the pEGASUS-HPC group and 2/35 (5.7%) in the CREDO heal group. At 3-6 months, the proportion of patients achieving an mRS score of 0-2 was 25/34 (73.5%) in the pEGASUS-HPC group and 28/35 (80.0%) in the CREDO heal group (p = 0.578).

CONCLUSION

Both stent systems proved effective and safe, showing significant post-intervention arterial dilation, high revascularization rates, and similar functional outcomes (mRS 0-2 at 3-6 months), though they differed in in-stent restenosis rates.

摘要

目的

比较与NeuroSpeed经皮血管成形术(PTA)球囊导管配合使用的pEGASUS-HPC和CREDO heal涂层支架系统,用于治疗伴有或不伴有急性血管闭塞(VO)的急性症状性颅内动脉狭窄(ICAS)的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了2021年6月至2024年6月期间接受NeuroSpeed PTA球囊导管和上述任一支架系统治疗的ICAS患者。临床终点包括美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分和改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,安全性和疗效终点包括支架内血栓形成和支架内狭窄。

结果

共纳入69例患者(pEGASUS-HPC组34例;CREDO heal组35例)。两组干预后动脉直径均有显著改善(pEGASUS-HPC组:从0.47mm(标准差0.27mm)增至1.69mm(标准差0.55mm);CREDO heal组:从0.57mm(标准差0.41mm)增至1.89mm(标准差0.62mm))。血管再通成功定义为残余狭窄<50%,pEGASUS-HPC组32/34(93.9%)例患者达到该标准,CREDO heal组33/35(94.3%)例患者达到该标准。pEGASUS-HPC组5/34(14.7%)例患者发生支架内再狭窄,CREDO heal组2/35(5.7%)例患者发生支架内再狭窄,分别有3/34(8.8%)和2/35(5.7%)的患者接受了PTA再次治疗。pEGASUS-HPC组3/34(8.8%)例患者在围手术期或术后发生支架内血栓形成,CREDO heal组2/35(5.7%)例患者发生支架内血栓形成。在3至6个月时,pEGASUS-HPC组25/34(73.5%)例患者mRS评分为0至2分,CREDO heal组28/35(80.0%)例患者mRS评分为0至2分(p = 0.578)。

结论

两种支架系统均证明有效且安全,干预后动脉均显著扩张,血管再通率高,且功能结局相似(3至6个月时mRS为0至2分),尽管它们在支架内再狭窄率方面存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验