Suppr超能文献

机械取栓装置在后循环卒中中的疗效及操作效率

Efficacy and procedural efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy devices in posterior circulation stroke.

作者信息

Ma Linlin, Cheng Zhe, Rajah Gary B, Yun Ho Jun, Geng Xiaokun, Ding Yuchuan

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Munson Medical Center, Traverse City, MI, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1620092. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1620092. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Posterior circulation stroke patients have worse outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and higher mortality than anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients due to large vessel occlusions (LVOs). To determine the ideal recanalization device for posterior circulation LVO strokes, this study compared the operational parameters and prognosis among three commonly used thrombectomy devices.

METHODS

A total of 99 patients with posterior circulation AIS who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were enrolled. The patients were divided into three groups based on the different thrombectomy devices used during the procedure. Patient demographics, procedural metrics, functional outcomes, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) were assessed. Any association between the devices and favorable clinical outcomes was assessed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were analyzed. The Penumbra aspiration catheter revealed a significant advantage for the time of recanalization vs. the other devices (32 min vs. 44 and 41 min). No significant difference was observed in other procedural parameters or functional outcome. There was no significant difference in symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, or functional independence after MT among the three groups. Diabetes mellitus, NIHSS score at admission, time from onset to recanalization, and occlusion site were associated with functional independence at 90 days, though the use of different recanalization devices did not make a significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Aspiration achieved vessel recanalization faster than the retriever stent during mechanical thrombectomy in posterior circulation AIS. No clear improved functional outcome favored one device over another in this study. The key factors affecting functional outcomes in posterior circulation LVOs were the presence or absence of diabetes, baseline NIHSS, occlusion site of basilar artery, and TOR time.

摘要

背景与目的

后循环卒中患者在接受机械取栓(MT)后预后较前循环急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者更差,且由于大血管闭塞(LVO)导致死亡率更高。为确定后循环LVO卒中的理想再通装置,本研究比较了三种常用取栓装置的操作参数和预后。

方法

共纳入99例接受机械取栓的后循环AIS患者。根据手术过程中使用的不同取栓装置将患者分为三组。评估患者的人口统计学特征、手术指标、功能结局和症状性颅内出血(sICH)。通过逻辑回归分析评估装置与良好临床结局之间的任何关联。

结果

共分析了80例患者。Penumbra抽吸导管在再通时间方面相对于其他装置显示出显著优势(32分钟对44分钟和41分钟)。在其他手术参数或功能结局方面未观察到显著差异。三组之间在症状性脑出血(sICH)、死亡率或MT后的功能独立性方面无显著差异。糖尿病、入院时的NIHSS评分、从发病到再通的时间以及闭塞部位与90天时的功能独立性相关,尽管使用不同的再通装置没有显著差异。

结论

在后循环AIS的机械取栓过程中,抽吸比取栓支架更快实现血管再通。在本研究中,没有明确的功能结局改善表明一种装置优于另一种装置。影响后循环LVO功能结局的关键因素是是否存在糖尿病、基线NIHSS、基底动脉闭塞部位和TOR时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b01/12329305/25188fbb5041/fneur-16-1620092-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验