Pettke Aleksandra, Keszei Marton, Christ Wanda, Mayola Danés Nuria, Gredmark-Russ Sara, Söderholm Sandra, Filén Finn, Storgärd Elisabet, Westergren Victor, Yman Victor, Aarum Johan, Klingström Jonas, Johansen Kari, Ekström Anna Mia, Sondén Klara
Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Aug 8:e0018225. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00182-25.
This study's aim was to evaluate and benchmark the gold-standard methods neutralization test (NT) and immunofluorescence (IF), against a model linked to a multiplex immunoassay method for analysis of the highly cross-reactive serological responses against the monkeypox (MPXV)- and vaccinia (VACV) viruses. Serum samples from men who have sex with men were analyzed (22 with previous PCR-confirmed mpox episode, 53 MVA-BN-vaccinated, 61 unexposed to infection/vaccination). In-house NTs and IF established titers of mpox- and vaccinia-specific neutralizing and binding IgG antibodies, respectively. The commercial Orthopoxvirus Panel 1 multiplex immunoassay (Meso Scale Discovery [MSD]) was used to measure IgG against five homologous MPXV and VACV antigens. Antibody titers were studied in relation to infection and vaccination. The gold-standard NT and IF assays had ≥90% sensitivity identifying mpox-infected individuals. Despite high specificities in the unexposed group (≥91.8%), serum samples of vaccinated individuals strongly cross-reacted in the gold-standard assays with specificities of 73.6% (MPXV NT) and 43.4% (MPXV IF). Similarly, in the MSD assay, no individual antigen could differentiate between MPXV- or VACV-specific IgG antibodies. However, using ratios of IgG concentrations against three MPXV/VACV antigens enabled classification of separated mpox infected, vaccinated, and unexposed individuals with 88.9% accuracy. Through an innovative analytic approach, utilizing antibody response ratios to homologous MPXV and VACV antigen pairs, we demonstrate a model which differentiates MPXV-infected individuals from vaccinated and unexposed. This approach shows promise as a tool for transmission surveillance and outbreak monitoring, particularly in resource poor settings with low diagnostic capacity, and to prioritize vaccine.
Our study provides a uniquely broad perspective on orthopox serology by contrasting the gold standard NT and IF methods with the novel MSD multiplex assay and by providing an analysis model of multiplex data to separate previously mpox-infected, MVA-BN-vaccinated, and unexposed individuals.
本研究的目的是针对一种与多重免疫分析方法相关的模型,评估并对比金标准方法中和试验(NT)和免疫荧光法(IF),以分析针对猴痘病毒(MPXV)和牛痘病毒(VACV)的高度交叉反应性血清学反应。对男男性行为者的血清样本进行了分析(22例曾有经PCR确诊的猴痘发作,53例接种了MVA - BN疫苗,61例未接触过感染/疫苗)。内部NT和IF分别确定了猴痘和牛痘特异性中和及结合IgG抗体的滴度。使用商业化的正痘病毒检测板1多重免疫分析(Meso Scale Discovery [MSD])来测量针对五种同源MPXV和VACV抗原的IgG。研究了抗体滴度与感染和疫苗接种的关系。金标准NT和IF检测识别猴痘感染个体的灵敏度≥90%。尽管在未接触组中特异性较高(≥91.8%),但接种疫苗个体的血清样本在金标准检测中出现强烈交叉反应,MPXV NT的特异性为73.6%,MPXV IF的特异性为43.4%。同样,在MSD检测中,没有单个抗原能够区分MPXV或VACV特异性IgG抗体。然而,使用针对三种MPXV/VACV抗原的IgG浓度比值能够以88.9%的准确率对分离的猴痘感染、接种疫苗和未接触个体进行分类。通过一种创新的分析方法,利用针对同源MPXV和VACV抗原对的抗体反应比值,我们展示了一种区分MPXV感染个体与接种疫苗和未接触个体的模型。这种方法有望作为一种用于传播监测和疫情监测的工具,特别是在诊断能力较低的资源匮乏环境中,并用于确定疫苗的优先使用顺序。
我们的研究通过将金标准NT和IF方法与新型MSD多重检测进行对比,并提供多重数据的分析模型以区分先前感染猴痘、接种MVA - BN疫苗和未接触的个体,为正痘病毒血清学提供了独特而广泛的视角。