Qiu Yidan, Li Huakang, Yang Yuanyuan, Lin Shuting, Zheng Xiaoyu, Jia Shuxin, Huang Ruiwang
School of Psychology; Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education; Center for the Study of Applied Psychology; Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
School of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Neuroimage. 2025 Sep;318:121415. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121415. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
How the brain coordinates to represent cognitive maps? Although extensive evidence shows the roles of the hippocampus (HIP), parahippocampal cortex (PHC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in spatial navigation, the specific mechanisms by which these brain regions interact to form and use cognitive maps remain unclear. Thus, we employed a task-fMRI during a navigation task in multidimensional abstract spaces to study how navigational complexity, assessed by navigation stages, spatial dimensions, and target distance, affects behavioral performance and brain activation. Our results revealed that the lateral OFC (lOFC) and medial OFC (mOFC) responded differently to navigation stages, and regions of the medial temporal lobe (MTL), including the HIP, PHC, and RSC, were involved in processing target distance. Generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) analysis showed increased connectivity between the lOFC and MTL regions during navigation, and decreased connectivity between the mOFC and MTL regions. These results showed functional divisions within the OFC, with distinct roles for the lateral and medial parts in both activation and connectivity during navigation. Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) further revealed the effective connectivity patterns between these regions, showing that the self-connectivity of the mOFC and HIP contributed to individual differences in behavior. In addition, the self-connectivity of the mOFC and the connectivity from PHC to HIP were predictive of individual navigation strategy preferences. These findings advance our understanding of the neural dynamics underlying abstract spatial cognition, offering new perspectives on how the brain supports adaptive behavior in complex environments.
大脑如何协同工作以表征认知地图?尽管大量证据表明海马体(HIP)、海马旁回皮质(PHC)、眶额皮质(OFC)和压后皮质(RSC)在空间导航中发挥作用,但这些脑区相互作用以形成和使用认知地图的具体机制仍不清楚。因此,我们在多维抽象空间中的导航任务期间采用了任务功能磁共振成像技术,以研究由导航阶段、空间维度和目标距离评估的导航复杂性如何影响行为表现和大脑激活。我们的结果显示,外侧眶额皮质(lOFC)和内侧眶额皮质(mOFC)对导航阶段的反应不同,内侧颞叶(MTL)区域,包括海马体、海马旁回皮质和压后皮质,参与了目标距离的处理。广义心理生理交互作用(gPPI)分析表明,在导航过程中,外侧眶额皮质与内侧颞叶区域之间的连通性增加,而内侧眶额皮质与内侧颞叶区域之间的连通性降低。这些结果显示了眶额皮质内的功能划分,外侧和内侧部分在导航过程中的激活和连通性方面具有不同的作用。动态因果模型(DCM)进一步揭示了这些区域之间的有效连通性模式,表明内侧眶额皮质和海马体的自连通性导致了行为上的个体差异。此外,内侧眶额皮质的自连通性以及从海马旁回皮质到海马体的连通性可预测个体的导航策略偏好。这些发现推进了我们对抽象空间认知背后神经动力学的理解,为大脑如何在复杂环境中支持适应性行为提供了新的视角。