Forseth Bethany, Carlson Jordan, Lancaster Brittany, Trofimoff Anna S, Glover Karynn, Hendel Katherine R, Hoft Galen, Davis Ann M
Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science & Athletic Training, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States.
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf036.
Childhood overweight/obesity in rural areas is a public health concern. Schools provide access to youth/families for health behavior programming but have adoption challenges.
To explore school adoption of a family-based behavioral obesity program (iAmHealthy) from the perspective of three groups: (i) schools adopting iAmHealthy ("adopters"; took part in the iAmHealthy program), (ii) schools failing to adopt iAmHealthy ("initial adopters"; initially signed up for the iAmHealthy program, but could not continue), and (iii) schools that did not adopt iAmHealthy ("non-adopters"; never signed up for the iAmHealthy program).
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural school representatives (N = 33; n = 12 adopters, n = 9 initial adopters, and n = 12 non-adopters). Interviews were analyzed thematically and aligned with constructs and domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Five themes emerged: (i) Regardless of the extent of healthy lifestyle programming schools offered, iAmHealthy would not compete and would benefit families, (ii) School representatives perceived a varied need for healthy behavior programming but challenges regarding limited resources were widespread, (iii) Partially due to concerns about stigma, school representatives preferred school-wide approaches that included integration with the curriculum and the community, (iv) School representatives considered many factors when deciding to participate in a health behavior program, and (v) School representatives expressed concerns about health behavior programming not being a priority for families. CFIR constructs within the domains of innovation, inner setting, outer setting, and individual characteristics aligned with the themes. Specifically, commonly cited barriers often aligned with the CFIR constructs of relative priority and local attitudes.
Findings indicate health behavior programming would fill an unmet need, but that there are adoption barriers, including limited resources, weight-related stigmatization concerns, and differing priorities across schools, communities, and families.
农村地区儿童超重/肥胖是一个公共卫生问题。学校为青少年/家庭提供了参与健康行为规划的途径,但在采用方面存在挑战。
从三组人群的角度探讨学校对基于家庭的行为肥胖项目(“我健康”)的采用情况:(i)采用“我健康”项目的学校(“采用者”;参与了“我健康”项目),(ii)未采用“我健康”项目的学校(“初始采用者”;最初报名参加“我健康”项目,但未能继续),以及(iii)未采用“我健康”项目的学校(“非采用者”;从未报名参加“我健康”项目)。
对农村学校代表进行了半结构化访谈(N = 33;n = 12名采用者,n = 9名初始采用者,n = 12名非采用者)。访谈进行了主题分析,并与实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的构建和领域进行了对照。
出现了五个主题:(i)无论学校提供的健康生活方式规划程度如何,“我健康”项目都不会形成竞争,且会使家庭受益,(ii)学校代表认为对健康行为规划有不同需求,但资源有限的挑战普遍存在,(iii)部分由于对污名化的担忧,学校代表更喜欢全校性的方法,包括与课程和社区的整合,(iv)学校代表在决定参与健康行为项目时考虑了许多因素,以及(v)学校代表对健康行为规划不是家庭的优先事项表示担忧。创新、内部环境、外部环境和个人特征领域内的CFIR构建与这些主题相符。具体而言,经常提到的障碍通常与CFIR的相对优先级和当地态度构建相符。
研究结果表明,健康行为规划将满足未得到满足的需求,但存在采用障碍,包括资源有限、与体重相关的污名化担忧以及学校、社区和家庭之间不同的优先事项。