Atero-Calvo Santiago, Magro Francesco, Masetti Giacomo, Navarro-León Eloy, Blasco Begoña, Ruiz Juan Manuel
Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Sofbey S.A., Via San Martino 16/A CH-6850, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland.
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 2;14(15):2386. doi: 10.3390/plants14152386.
In the present study, we evaluated the potential use of a humic substance (HS)-based biostimulant in mitigating drought stress in lettuce ( L.) by comparing both root and foliar modes of application. To achieve this, lettuce plants were grown in a growth chamber on a solid substrate composed of vermiculite and perlite (3:1). Plants were exposed to drought conditions (50% of Field Capacity, FC) and 50% FC + HS applied as radicular ('R') and foliar ('F') at concentrations: R-HS 0.40 and 0.60 mL/L, respectively, and 7.50 and 10.00 mL/L, respectively, along with a control (100% FC). HSs were applied three times at 10-day intervals. Plant growth, nutrient concentration, lipid peroxidation, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants were estimated. Various photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were also analyzed. The results showed that HS applications alleviated drought stress, increased plant growth, and reduced lipid peroxidation and ROS accumulation. HSs also improved the net photosynthetic rate, carboxylation efficiency, electron transport flux, and water use efficiency. Although foliar HSs showed a greater tendency to enhance shoot growth and photosynthetic capacity, the differences between the application methods were not significant. Hence, in this preliminary work, the HS-based product evaluated in this study demonstrated potential for alleviating drought stress in lettuce plants at the applied doses, regardless of the mode of application. This study highlights HS-based biostimulants as an effective and sustainable tool to improve crop resilience and support sustainable agriculture under climate change. However, further studies under controlled growth chamber conditions are needed to confirm these results before field trials.
在本研究中,我们通过比较根部和叶面施用方式,评估了一种基于腐殖质(HS)的生物刺激剂在减轻生菜干旱胁迫方面的潜在用途。为此,生菜植株在生长室中种植于由蛭石和珍珠岩(3:1)组成的固体基质上。植株暴露于干旱条件下(田间持水量的50%,FC)以及50% FC + HS,分别以根部('R')和叶面('F')方式施用,浓度分别为:根部施用HS为0.40和0.60 mL/L,叶面施用HS为7.50和10.00 mL/L,同时设置对照(100% FC)。HS每隔10天施用3次。对植株生长、养分浓度、脂质过氧化、活性氧(ROS)以及酶促和非酶促抗氧化剂进行了评估。还分析了各种光合和叶绿素荧光参数。结果表明,施用HS减轻了干旱胁迫,增加了植株生长,减少了脂质过氧化和ROS积累。HS还提高了净光合速率、羧化效率、电子传递通量和水分利用效率。尽管叶面施用HS在促进地上部生长和光合能力方面表现出更大的趋势,但施用方式之间的差异并不显著。因此,在这项初步工作中,本研究评估的基于HS的产品在施用剂量下显示出减轻生菜植株干旱胁迫的潜力,无论施用方式如何。本研究强调基于HS的生物刺激剂是一种有效且可持续的工具,可提高作物抗逆性并支持气候变化下的可持续农业。然而,在进行田间试验之前,需要在可控的生长室条件下进行进一步研究以证实这些结果。