• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索住院患者的情感安全与伤害:一项关于患者和医护人员观点的定性研究

Exploring Emotional Safety and Harm Among Hospitalized Patients: A Qualitative Study of Patients' and Providers' Perspectives.

作者信息

Khan Afsha, Muhammad Dildar, Naz Najma, Khanum Sabiha, Khan Awal

机构信息

Institute of Nursing Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan.

Medical Teaching Institution, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar 25110, Pakistan.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;13(15):1842. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151842.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13151842
PMID:40805874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12346503/
Abstract

Emotional safety is increasingly recognized as crucial for high-quality patient care, encompassing a patient's sense of security, courteous treatment, being heard, and a peaceful environment. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of patients and providers (doctors and nurses) regarding emotional harm and safety in relation to hospitalized patients. We conducted a qualitative study in public-sector teaching hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan. Data were collected after we obtained informed consent using individual interviews with 15 providers, namely, doctors (n = 7) and nurses (n = 8), and five focus group discussions (FGDs) with 25 hospitalized patients. Data from both the interviews and FGDs were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach to thematic analysis. The key themes revealed by the providers' perspectives were factors contributing to emotional harm, staff-related factors, coping mechanisms and solutions, and the impact of prior experiences and involvement. The main themes that emerged from the patients' perspectives were anxiety upon admission, the impact of communication, emotional stress due to treatment delays, systemic/bureaucratic challenges, financial burden, a lack of emotional support, and post-hospitalization concerns. The consistent perspectives shared by both patients and providers included the impact of systemic factors, communication issues, the role of staff attitude/behavior, financial concerns, and the influence of prior experiences. This study highlights the complex interplay of systemic, staff-related, and patient-specific factors. It suggests a need to improve communication, staff support, administrative processes, financial counseling, emotional support integration, and discharge planning to minimize harm and create a patient-centered environment.

摘要

情感安全对于高质量的患者护理日益被视为至关重要,它涵盖患者的安全感、礼貌对待、被倾听以及宁静的环境。本研究的目的是探讨患者和医护人员(医生和护士)对住院患者情感伤害和安全的看法。我们在巴基斯坦白沙瓦的公立教学医院进行了一项定性研究。在获得知情同意后,通过对15名医护人员(7名医生和8名护士)进行个人访谈以及与25名住院患者进行五次焦点小组讨论来收集数据。使用布劳恩和克拉克的六阶段主题分析法对访谈和焦点小组讨论的数据进行分析。从医护人员的角度揭示的关键主题是导致情感伤害的因素、与工作人员相关的因素、应对机制和解决方案以及既往经历和参与的影响。从患者的角度出现的主要主题是入院时的焦虑、沟通的影响、治疗延迟导致的情感压力、系统/官僚主义挑战、经济负担、缺乏情感支持以及出院后担忧。患者和医护人员共同持有的一致观点包括系统因素的影响、沟通问题、工作人员态度/行为的作用、经济担忧以及既往经历的影响。本研究突出了系统、与工作人员相关和患者特定因素之间复杂的相互作用。它表明需要改善沟通、工作人员支持、行政流程、经济咨询、情感支持整合以及出院计划,以尽量减少伤害并营造以患者为中心的环境。

相似文献

1
Exploring Emotional Safety and Harm Among Hospitalized Patients: A Qualitative Study of Patients' and Providers' Perspectives.探索住院患者的情感安全与伤害:一项关于患者和医护人员观点的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;13(15):1842. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151842.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
"It's a tool, it's got hardships": a qualitative study of patient experience of colonoscopy and implications for trauma-informed care.“这是一种工具,会有艰难之处”:一项关于结肠镜检查患者体验及对创伤知情护理影响的定性研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;18:17562848251346250. doi: 10.1177/17562848251346250. eCollection 2025.
4
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
7
Most Patients With Bone Sarcomas Seek Emotional Support and Information About Other Patients' Experiences: A Thematic Analysis.大多数骨肉瘤患者寻求情感支持和其他患者经验的信息:主题分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):161-171. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002761. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional safety in maternity care: An evolutionary concept analysis.产妇保健中的情感安全:一个进化概念分析。
Midwifery. 2025 Jan;140:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104220. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
'Safer, Not Safe': Service Users' Experiences of Psychological Safety in Inpatient Mental Health Wards in the United Kingdom.“更安全,但并不安全”:英国住院心理健康病房中服务使用者对心理安全感的体验。
3
Patients' sense of security from clinical factors in Iran: a cross-sectional study.伊朗临床因素对患者安全感的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10677-x.
4
Protecting Lives and Preserving Dignity: Emotional Safety in Emergency Nursing.保护生命,维护尊严:急诊护理中的情感安全
J Emerg Nurs. 2023 Sep;49(5):647-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.06.007.
5
Emotional safety patient safety.情感安全与患者安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jul;32(7):369-372. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015573. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
6
Am I safe? An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Vulnerability as Experienced by Patients With Complications Following Surgery.我安全吗?手术并发症患者脆弱性体验的阐释现象学分析。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Dec;32(14):2078-2089. doi: 10.1177/10497323221136956. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
7
How do hospital inpatients conceptualise patient safety? A qualitative interview study using constructivist grounded theory.医院住院患者如何看待患者安全?一项采用建构主义扎根理论的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jul;32(7):383-393. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014695. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
8
An Exploration Into Patients' Experiences That Make Them Feel Safe During Hospitalization: A Qualitative Study.患者在住院期间感到安全的体验探索:一项定性研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Aug 22;37(33):e256. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e256.
9
The Impact of Effective Communication on Perceptions of Patient Safety-A Prospective Study in Selected Polish Hospitals.有效沟通对患者安全感知的影响——波兰部分选定医院的前瞻性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;19(15):9174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159174.
10
A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care.心理安全感的概念分析:进一步理解其在医疗保健中的应用。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):467-489. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1086. Epub 2021 Oct 15.