Zvenigorodsky Vladislav, Gruenbaum Benjamin F, Shelef Ilan, Frank Dmitry, Tsafarov Beatris, Negev Shahar, Zeldetz Vladimir, Azab Abed N, Boyko Matthew, Zlotnik Alexander
Department of Radiology, Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 29;26(15):7333. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157333.
Diffuse axonal brain injury (DAI) is a common, debilitating consequence of traumatic brain injury, yet its detection and severity grading remain challenging in clinical and experimental settings. This study evaluated the sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), histology, and neurological severity scoring (NSS) in assessing injury severity in a rat model of isolated DAI. A rotational injury model induced mild, moderate, or severe DAI in male and female rats. Neurological deficits were assessed 48 h after injury via NSS. Magnetic resonance imaging, including DTI metrics, such as fractional anisotropy (FA), relative anisotropy (RA), axial diffusivity (AD), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD), was performed prior to tissue collection. Histological analysis used beta amyloid precursor protein immunohistochemistry. Sensitivity and variability of each method were compared across brain regions and the whole brain. Histology was the most sensitive method, requiring very small groups to detect differences. Anisotropy-based MRI metrics, especially whole-brain FA and RA, showed strong correlations with histology and NSS and demonstrated high sensitivity with low variability. NSS identified injury but required larger group sizes. Diffusivity-based MRI metrics, particularly RD, were less sensitive and more variable. Whole-brain FA and RA were the most sensitive MRI measures of DAI severity and were comparable to histology in moderate and severe groups. These findings support combining NSS and anisotropy-based DTI for non-terminal DAI assessment in preclinical studies.
弥漫性轴索脑损伤(DAI)是创伤性脑损伤常见且使人衰弱的后果,但在临床和实验环境中,其检测和严重程度分级仍具有挑战性。本研究评估了扩散张量成像(DTI)、组织学和神经严重程度评分(NSS)在评估孤立性DAI大鼠模型损伤严重程度方面的敏感性。通过旋转损伤模型在雄性和雌性大鼠中诱导轻度、中度或重度DAI。损伤后48小时通过NSS评估神经功能缺损。在组织收集之前进行磁共振成像,包括DTI指标,如分数各向异性(FA)、相对各向异性(RA)、轴向扩散率(AD)、平均扩散率(MD)和径向扩散率(RD)。组织学分析采用β淀粉样前体蛋白免疫组织化学法。比较了每种方法在不同脑区和全脑的敏感性和变异性。组织学是最敏感的方法,只需非常小的样本量就能检测到差异。基于各向异性的MRI指标,尤其是全脑FA和RA,与组织学和NSS显示出强烈的相关性,并表现出高敏感性和低变异性。NSS能识别损伤,但需要更大的样本量。基于扩散率的MRI指标,特别是RD,敏感性较低且变异性更大。全脑FA和RA是评估DAI严重程度最敏感的MRI指标,在中度和重度组中与组织学相当。这些发现支持在临床前研究中结合NSS和基于各向异性的DTI进行非终末期DAI评估。