• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤患者入院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分:一项多中心观察性分析。

Glasgow Coma Scale Score at Admission in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Multicenter Observational Analysis.

作者信息

Vadan Iulia-Maria, Grad Diana, Strilciuc Stefan, Stefanescu Emanuel, Verisezan Rosu Olivia, Michalak Marcin, Blesneag Alina Vasilica, Muresanu Dafin

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 22;14(15):5195. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155195.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14155195
PMID:40806816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12347532/
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide, with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) serving as a tool to measure injury severity. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between GCS admission scores and various socio-demographic, clinical, injury-related, and hospital-related variables in patients with TBI across two tertiary care centers in Eastern Europe, a region that remains underrepresented in the literature. A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from 119 TBI patients admitted between March 2020 and June 2023 at Cluj County Emergency Hospital (Romania) and Saint Vincent Hospital (Poland). GCS scores were analyzed as both categorical and continuous variables. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests for group comparisons and Spearman correlations for continuous variables. Most patients included suffered a mild TBI (GCS score between 13 and 15). There were significant associations between GCS scores and post-traumatic amnesia ( < 0.05), discharge status ( < 0.01), discharge destination ( < 0.01), and education level ( < 0.01). GCS scores at admission were linked to survival, absence of post-traumatic amnesia, higher education levels, and home discharge. No significant differences observed across sex, residence, employment status, injury type, cause, or mechanism of injury. A weak but significant negative correlation was observed between GCS and length of hospital stay (rho = -0.229, > 0.05), while age showed a non-significant correlation. The GCS score at admission is significantly associated with various clinical and socio-demographic outcomes in TBI patients, supporting the utility of the GCS score as a prognostic tool. The predominance of mild cases and the absence of radiological data, such as cerebral contusions or epidural or subdural hematomas, limit the generalizability of the findings. Further studies with larger samples and comprehensive imaging data are necessary to validate these findings.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球发病的主要原因,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)作为衡量损伤严重程度的工具。本研究旨在调查东欧两个三级医疗中心TBI患者的GCS入院评分与各种社会人口统计学、临床、损伤相关和医院相关变量之间的关系,该地区在文献中仍然代表性不足。使用2020年3月至2023年6月期间在克卢日县急诊医院(罗马尼亚)和圣文森特医院(波兰)收治的119例TBI患者的数据进行了一项回顾性观察研究。GCS评分作为分类变量和连续变量进行分析。统计分析包括用于组间比较的Wilcoxon和Kruskal-Wallis检验以及用于连续变量的Spearman相关性分析。大多数纳入的患者患有轻度TBI(GCS评分在13至15之间)。GCS评分与创伤后遗忘(<0.05)、出院状态(<0.01)、出院目的地(<0.01)和教育水平(<0.01)之间存在显著关联。入院时的GCS评分与生存、无创伤后遗忘、高等教育水平和家庭出院有关。在性别、居住地、就业状况、损伤类型、原因或损伤机制方面未观察到显著差异。GCS与住院时间之间观察到微弱但显著的负相关(rho = -0.229,>0.05),而年龄显示无显著相关性。入院时的GCS评分与TBI患者的各种临床和社会人口统计学结果显著相关,支持GCS评分作为预后工具的实用性。轻度病例的优势以及缺乏脑挫裂伤或硬膜外或硬膜下血肿等放射学数据限制了研究结果的普遍性。需要进一步进行更大样本和综合影像数据的研究来验证这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d8f/12347532/4d2773ca4d67/jcm-14-05195-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d8f/12347532/34b251b9a198/jcm-14-05195-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d8f/12347532/38845b9aff48/jcm-14-05195-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d8f/12347532/4d2773ca4d67/jcm-14-05195-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d8f/12347532/34b251b9a198/jcm-14-05195-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d8f/12347532/38845b9aff48/jcm-14-05195-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d8f/12347532/4d2773ca4d67/jcm-14-05195-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Glasgow Coma Scale Score at Admission in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Multicenter Observational Analysis.创伤性脑损伤患者入院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分:一项多中心观察性分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 22;14(15):5195. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155195.
2
Cisternostomy is not beneficial to reduce the occurrence of post-traumatic hydrocephalus in Traumatic Brain Injury.经蝶窦入路视神经减压术不能降低颅脑创伤后发生脑积水的风险。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 30;166(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06084-0.
3
Clinical Assessment on Days 1-14 for the Characterization of Traumatic Brain Injury: Recommendations from the 2024 NINDS Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Clinical/Symptoms Working Group.创伤性脑损伤特征的第1至14天临床评估:2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名倡议临床/症状工作组的建议
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1038-1055. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0577. Epub 2025 May 20.
4
Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.成人和儿童轻微头部损伤的诊断管理策略:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(27):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15270.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Association of left ventricular systolic dysfunction with outcome following pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤后左心室收缩功能障碍与预后的关系
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2025 May 16;36(2):186-192. doi: 10.3171/2025.3.PEDS24655. Print 2025 Aug 1.
7
Elevation of the head during intensive care management in people with severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者在重症监护管理期间抬高床头。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD009986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009986.pub2.
8
Factors affecting severity and prognosis of traumatic brain injury among Bangladeshi patients: An institution based cross-sectional study.影响孟加拉国患者创伤性脑损伤严重程度和预后的因素:基于机构的横断面研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(8):1072-1080. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2363470. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
The Power of Partial: Full Versus Partial Endovascular Aortic Occlusion in Traumatic Brain Injury.部分的力量:创伤性脑损伤中完全与部分血管内主动脉闭塞的比较
J Surg Res. 2025 Aug;312:155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.05.019. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
10
Operative neurosurgery for traumatic subdural hematoma: association between trauma center variation and patient outcomes.创伤性硬膜下血肿的手术神经外科治疗:创伤中心差异与患者预后之间的关联。
J Neurosurg. 2025 Jul 25:1-11. doi: 10.3171/2025.3.JNS242811.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive factors for traumatic cerebral contusion volume, expansion, and outcomes.创伤性脑挫伤体积、扩大及预后的预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2025 Jan 3;142(6):1616-1624. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.JNS241051. Print 2025 Jun 1.
2
Traumatic brain injury in elderly population: A global systematic review and meta-analysis of in-hospital mortality and risk factors among 2.22 million individuals.老年人群创伤性脑损伤:222 万人住院死亡率及危险因素的全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2024 Aug;99:102376. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102376. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
3
The Predictive Value of the Verbal Glasgow Coma Scale in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.
格拉斯哥昏迷量表言语评分在创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值:系统评价。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024;39(4):273-283. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000938. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
4
Classification and Characterization of Traumatic Brain Injuries in the Northern Region of Sweden.瑞典北部地区创伤性脑损伤的分类与特征分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):8. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010008.
5
Intramural Healthcare Consumption and Costs After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.创伤性脑损伤后的院内医疗保健消费和成本:一项协作性的欧洲神经创伤有效性研究创伤性脑损伤(CENTER-TBI)研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Oct;40(19-20):2126-2145. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0429. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
In-hospital mortality and risk factors among elderly patients with traumatic brain injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.院内死亡率和老年创伤性脑损伤患者的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):e065371. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065371.
7
Glasgow coma scale compared to other trauma scores in discriminating in-hospital mortality of traumatic brain injury patients admitted to urban Indian hospitals: A multicentre prospective cohort study.在印度城市医院收治的创伤性脑损伤患者中,格拉斯哥昏迷量表与其他创伤评分在区分院内死亡率方面的比较:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.035. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
8
Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.创伤性脑损伤:预防、临床护理和研究方面的进展和挑战。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Nov;21(11):1004-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00309-X. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score for prediction of in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.格拉斯哥昏迷量表与全面无反应评分预测创伤性脑损伤患者院内死亡率的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1693-1706. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02111-w. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
10
Traumatic brain injury: Association between the Glasgow Coma Scale score and intensive care unit mortality.创伤性脑损伤:格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与重症监护病房死亡率之间的关联。
South Afr J Crit Care. 2022 Aug 5;38(2). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2022.v38i2.525. eCollection 2022.