Suppr超能文献

一种平衡明胶溶液用于脓毒症液体复苏的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲试验——GENIUS试验

Efficacy and Safety of a Balanced Gelatine Solution for Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis: A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial-GENIUS Trial.

作者信息

Marx Gernot, Benes Jan, Ferrer Ricard, Fries Dietmar, Ehler Johannes, Dembinski Rolf, Rosenberger Peter, Zacharowski Kai, Sanchez Manuel, Asehnoune Karim, Bachmann-Mennenga Bernd, Ichai Carole, Simon Tim-Philipp

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Masaryk Hospital, J.E. Purkinje University, 400 96 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 28;14(15):5323. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155323.

Abstract

: Sepsis is a leading cause of death in noncoronary intensive care units (ICUs). Fluids for intravascular resuscitation include crystalloids and colloids. There is extensive clinical evidence on colloid use, but large trials comparing gelatine with crystalloid regimens in ICU and septic patients are lacking. This study aimed to determine whether early, protocol-driven volume resuscitation using a gelatine-based regimen achieves hemodynamic stability (HDS) more rapidly than a crystalloid-based regimen in septic patients. : This prospective, controlled, randomised, double-blind, multinational phase IV study compared two parallel groups of septic patients receiving a gelatine-based regimen (Gelaspan 4% and Sterofundin ISO, B. Braun Melsungen AG each, at a 1:1 ratio) or a crystalloid regimen (Sterofundin ISO). Primary endpoint was time to first HDS within 48 h after randomisation. Secondary endpoints included fluid overload, fluid balance, and patient outcomes. : 167 patients were randomised. HDS was achieved after 4.7 h in the gelatine group and after 5.8 h in the crystalloid group ( = 0.3716). The gelatine group had a more favourable fluid balance at 24 h (medians: 3463.00 mL vs. 4164.00 mL; = 0.0395) and less fluid overload (medians: 4296.05 vs. 5218.75%; = 0.0217). No differences were observed in serious adverse events or mortality. : The study provided clinical evidence of balanced gelatine solution for volume resuscitation in septic patients, although it was terminated prematurely. The early and protocol-based administration of gelatine was safe and effective in the enrolled patient population. Time to HDS was not different between groups but the gelatine-based regimen led to better fluid balance and less fluid overload.

摘要

脓毒症是导致非冠心病重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡的主要原因之一。用于血管内复苏的液体包括晶体液和胶体液。关于胶体液的使用有大量临床证据,但缺乏在ICU和脓毒症患者中比较明胶与晶体液方案的大型试验。本研究旨在确定在脓毒症患者中,采用基于明胶的方案进行早期、基于方案的容量复苏是否比基于晶体液的方案能更快实现血流动力学稳定(HDS)。

这项前瞻性、对照、随机、双盲、多中心IV期研究比较了两组并行的脓毒症患者,一组接受基于明胶的方案(4% Gelaspan和B. Braun Melsungen AG的Sterofundin ISO,各占1:1比例),另一组接受晶体液方案(Sterofundin ISO)。主要终点是随机分组后48小时内首次达到HDS的时间。次要终点包括液体超负荷、液体平衡和患者预后。

167例患者被随机分组。明胶组在4.7小时后达到HDS,晶体液组在5.8小时后达到HDS(P = 0.3716)。明胶组在24小时时的液体平衡更有利(中位数:3463.00 mL对4164.00 mL;P = 0.0395),液体超负荷更少(中位数:4296.05对5218.75%;P = 0.0217)。在严重不良事件或死亡率方面未观察到差异。

该研究为脓毒症患者容量复苏中使用平衡明胶溶液提供了临床证据,尽管研究提前终止。在入组患者群体中,早期且基于方案的明胶给药是安全有效的。两组达到HDS的时间无差异,但基于明胶的方案导致更好的液体平衡和更少的液体超负荷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32b9/12346933/e3620d208b6f/jcm-14-05323-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验