Suppr超能文献

蔡司MEL90和爱尔康威视波前EX500准分子激光在美国食品药品监督管理局近视、远视和混合散光治疗上市前批准试验中的比较。

Comparison of Zeiss MEL90 and Alcon WaveLight EX500 Excimer Lasers in FDA Premarket Approval Trials for the Treatment of Myopia, Hyperopia, and Mixed Astigmatism.

作者信息

Brandenburg Traeson M, Sitto Mina M, Hoopes Phillip C, Moshirfar Majid

机构信息

Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.

Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5403. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155403.

Abstract

: Although both the MEL90 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) and WaveLight EX500 (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) are two widely used excimer lasers, comparisons between the two remain limited. This study evaluates visual and refractive outcomes from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) premarket approval trials of these platforms in the treatment of myopia with and without astigmatism, hyperopia with and without astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism. : Clinical outcomes from FDA premarket approval trials were compared between the recently approved MEL90 and the WaveLight (now termed EX500) excimer lasers. : A total of 714 eyes (358 patients) from MEL90 and 1353 eyes (706 patients) from EX500 were analyzed up to 6 months postoperatively. In the hyperopia/hyperopic astigmatism cohort, the EX500 demonstrated greater efficacy relative to MEL90, with more eyes achieving a postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better (48.6% vs. 68.7%, respectively; < 0.001). In both the MEL90 and EX500, at least 85% of eyes with myopia/myopic astigmatism and 68% with mixed astigmatism achieved a postoperative UDVA of 20/20 or better. For all refractive cohorts, more than 95% of eyes achieved a UDVA of 20/40 or better at 6 months (all > 0.05). The EX500 was more likely to demonstrate an improvement of more than two lines of UDVA compared to baseline CDVA (all < 0.05). In contrast, the MEL90 showed greater predictability of spherical equivalent within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D for the hyperopia/hyperopic astigmatism cohort (both = 0.007), as well as within ±0.50 D for the myopia/myopic astigmatism cohort ( < 0.001). Postoperatively, both platforms were associated with decreased glare and halos, although findings were variable in the EX500 mixed astigmatism cohort. : Both excimer lasers demonstrated safe and effective outcomes that exceed the threshold set by the FDA.

摘要

虽然MEL90(德国耶拿卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司)和威视EX500(美国德克萨斯州沃思堡爱尔康实验室公司)都是广泛使用的准分子激光,但两者之间的比较仍然有限。本研究评估了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对这些平台进行的上市前批准试验在治疗伴有或不伴有散光的近视、伴有或不伴有散光的远视以及混合性散光方面的视觉和屈光效果。:比较了最近批准的MEL90和威视(现称为EX500)准分子激光在FDA上市前批准试验中的临床结果。:对MEL90的714只眼(358例患者)和EX500的1353只眼(706例患者)进行了术后6个月的分析。在远视/远视散光队列中,EX500相对于MEL90显示出更高的疗效,更多的眼睛术后裸眼远视力(UDVA)达到20/20或更好(分别为48.6%和68.7%;<0.001)。在MEL90和EX500中,至少85%的近视/近视散光眼和68%的混合性散光眼术后UDVA达到20/20或更好。对于所有屈光队列,超过95%的眼睛在6个月时UDVA达到20/40或更好(均>0.05)。与基线矫正视力(CDVA)相比,EX500更有可能显示UDVA提高超过两行(均<0.05)。相比之下,MEL90在远视/远视散光队列中在±0.50 D和±1.00 D范围内以及近视/近视散光队列中在±0.50 D范围内显示出更高的球镜等效度可预测性(均=0.007,近视/近视散光队列为<0.001)。术后,两个平台都与眩光和光晕减少有关,尽管在EX500混合性散光队列中的结果存在差异。:两种准分子激光均显示出安全有效的结果,超过了FDA设定的阈值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fcb/12347908/6609ff5de6ec/jcm-14-05403-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验