Kuroda Hironori, Yokoo Suguru, Okada Yukimasa, Kondo Junya, Sakagami Koji, Ichikawa Takahiko, Yamana Keiya, Terada Chuji
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima 721-8511, Japan.
Shock and Trauma Center, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai 270-1694, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):5557. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155557.
Anterior redisplacement, defined as a postoperative anterior shift of the distal fragment despite intraoperative reduction, is occasionally observed after cephalomedullary nailing for trochanteric femoral fractures. However, its incidence and associated risk factors remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the incidence of anterior redisplacement following intramedullary nail fixation in geriatric trochanteric fractures, and to identify independent risk factors. This study retrospectively reviewed data from 598 consecutive hips in 577 patients (aged ≥65 years) who underwent intramedullary nail fixation for trochanteric fractures at a single center (2012-2023). Sagittal reduction on the lateral radiographic view was classified as posterior, anatomical, or anterior according to the position of the distal fragment, and was recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Anterior redisplacement, the primary outcome, was defined as a change in alignment from a posterior or anatomical position postoperatively to an anterior position on any subsequent follow-up radiograph. Independent risk factors were identified by logistic regression. Among the 543 hips reduced posteriorly ( = 204) or anatomically ( = 339), anterior redisplacement occurred in 73 (13.4%). The incidence of anterior redisplacement was significantly higher following anatomical compared to posterior reduction (19.5% vs. 3.4%; < 0.001), and also higher in fractures that were anteriorly aligned preoperatively (18.0%) compared to anatomical (8.5%; < 0.01) and posterior (6.2%; < 0.01) alignment. Multivariate analysis revealed two independent predictors: preoperative anterior alignment (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.81; = 0.003) and postoperative anatomical (vs. posterior) reduction (OR 6.49, 95% CI 2.92-14.44; < 0.001). Age, sex, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, Evans-Jensen classification, nail length, and canal-filling ratio were not associated with redisplacement. No lag-screw cutout occurred during the follow-up. Anterior redisplacement occurred in one of seven geriatric trochanteric fractures despite apparently satisfactory fixation. An anatomical sagittal reduction-traditionally considered "ideal"-increases the risk more than sixfold, whereas a deliberate posterior-buttress is protective. Unlike patient-related risk factors, sagittal reduction is under the surgeon's control. The study findings provide evidence that choosing a slight posterior bias can significantly improve stability.
前向再移位是指尽管术中已实现复位,但股骨转子间骨折行髓内钉固定术后远端骨折块出现向前移位,这种情况偶尔可见。然而,其发生率及相关危险因素仍不明确。本研究旨在确定老年股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定术后前向再移位的发生率,并识别独立危险因素。本研究回顾性分析了在单一中心(2012 - 2023年)接受髓内钉固定治疗转子间骨折的577例患者(年龄≥65岁)的598例连续髋关节的数据。根据外侧位X线片上远端骨折块的位置,矢状面复位分为后倾、解剖复位或前倾,并在术前和术后记录。主要观察指标前向再移位定义为术后从后倾或解剖复位位置变为后续任何随访X线片上前倾位置的对线改变。通过逻辑回归识别独立危险因素。在543例实现后倾(n = 204)或解剖复位(n = 339)的髋关节中,73例(13.4%)出现前向再移位。与后倾复位相比,解剖复位后前向再移位的发生率显著更高(19.5%对3.4%;P < 0.001),术前呈前倾对线的骨折(18.0%)与解剖复位(8.5%;P < 0.01)和后倾复位(6.2%;P < 0.01)相比,前向再移位的发生率也更高。多因素分析显示两个独立预测因素:术前前倾对线(比值比[OR] 1.87,95%置信区间[CI] 1.24 - 2.81;P = 0.003)和术后解剖复位(相对于后倾复位)(OR 6.49,95% CI 2.92 - 14.44;P < 0.001)。年龄、性别、 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/骨科创伤协会分类、Evans - Jensen分类、髓内钉长度和髓腔填充率与再移位无关。随访期间未发生拉力螺钉穿出。尽管固定看似满意,但7例老年股骨转子间骨折中有1例出现前向再移位。传统上认为“理想”的解剖矢状面复位使风险增加超过6倍,而有意采用后倾支撑则具有保护作用。与患者相关的危险因素不同,矢状面复位由外科医生控制。研究结果表明选择轻微的后倾偏差可显著提高稳定性。