Styler Breelyn Kane, Deng Wei, Chung Cheng-Shiu, Ding Dan
Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 2;25(15):4768. doi: 10.3390/s25154768.
Wheelchair-mounted assistive robotic manipulators can provide reach and grasp functions for power wheelchair users. This in-lab study evaluated a vision-guided shared control (VGS) system with twelve users completing two multi-step kitchen tasks: a drinking task and a popcorn making task. Using a mixed methods approach participants compared VGS and manual joystick control, providing performance metrics, qualitative insights, and lessons learned. Data collection included demographic questionnaires, the System Usability Scale (SUS), NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and exit interviews. No significant SUS differences were found between control modes, but NASA-TLX scores revealed VGS control significantly reduced workload during the drinking task and the popcorn task. VGS control reduced operation time and improved task success but was not universally preferred. Six participants preferred VGS, five preferred manual, and one had no preference. In addition, participants expressed interest in robotic arms for daily tasks and described two main operation challenges: distinguishing wrist orientation from rotation modes and managing depth perception. They also shared perspectives on how a personal robotic arm could complement caregiver support in their home.
安装在轮椅上的辅助机器人操纵器可为电动轮椅使用者提供够取和抓握功能。这项实验室研究评估了一种视觉引导共享控制(VGS)系统,12名用户完成了两项多步骤厨房任务:饮水任务和制作爆米花任务。采用混合方法,参与者比较了VGS和手动操纵杆控制,提供了性能指标、定性见解和经验教训。数据收集包括人口统计问卷、系统可用性量表(SUS)、美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)和退场访谈。在控制模式之间未发现显著的SUS差异,但NASA-TLX分数显示,VGS控制在饮水任务和爆米花任务期间显著降低了工作量。VGS控制减少了操作时间并提高了任务成功率,但并非普遍受到青睐。6名参与者更喜欢VGS,5名更喜欢手动操作,1名没有偏好。此外,参与者对用于日常任务的机械臂表示感兴趣,并描述了两个主要操作挑战:区分手腕方向与旋转模式以及管理深度感知。他们还分享了关于个人机械臂如何在家中补充护理人员支持的观点。