Zhang Run, Zheng Zihao, Lu Yinli, Shi Kai, Lin Zongbin, Tang Siyu, Shao Ziqiang, Yang Xianghong, Liu Jingquan
Emergency and Critical Care Center, Intensive Care Unit, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310014, People's Republic of China.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310015, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Aug 9;18:3977-3991. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S542467. eCollection 2025.
The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has led to a critical challenge in antimicrobial therapy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of colistin (COL) combined with ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) in the treatment of CR-GNB infections.
A retrospective, single-center observational study was conducted on patients diagnosed with CR-GNB infections who were treated with COL combined with CAZ/AVI (C/C), COL combined with Tigecycline (C/T), and COL combined with meropenem (C/M). The primary outcome measure was the rate of microbiological clearance within seven days, while secondary outcomes included changes in inflammatory markers, severe illness-related scores, length of stay, and survival rates.
Among the 95 patients analyzed, the C/C treatment regimen resulted in a higher rate of microbiological clearance (64.7%) compared to C/T (24.1%) and C/M (25.0%) (=0.002 and =0.001). In the subgroup analysis for treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant (CRKP), the 7-day microbial clearance rates in the C/C, C/T, and C/M groups were 57.9%, 25.0%, and 29.4%, respectively (P = 0.122). Inflammatory markers, including white blood cell count, c-reactive protein, and procalcitonin, showed improvements in three groups. The decrease of some indicators was statistically significant. However, no significant differences in mortality rates were observed across the treatment groups. Furthermore, the survival curve analysis indicates that the survival time of the C/M treatment regimen is significantly longer than that of the C/C treatment regimen.
The C/C treatment regimen appears to be more effective in achieving microbiological clearance and improving inflammatory parameters in patients with CR-GNB infections. While the impact on survival rates and survival duration requires further investigation, the C/C regimen warrants consideration as a potent therapeutic option for CR-GNB infections.
耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌(CR-GNB)的出现给抗菌治疗带来了严峻挑战。本研究旨在评估黏菌素(COL)联合头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAZ/AVI)治疗CR-GNB感染的疗效。
对诊断为CR-GNB感染且接受COL联合CAZ/AVI(C/C)、COL联合替加环素(C/T)以及COL联合美罗培南(C/M)治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性单中心观察性研究。主要结局指标为7天内的微生物清除率,次要结局包括炎症标志物变化、重症相关评分、住院时间和生存率。
在分析的95例患者中,C/C治疗方案的微生物清除率(64.7%)高于C/T(24.1%)和C/M(25.0%)(P = 0.002和P = 0.001)。在治疗耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)引起的感染的亚组分析中,C/C、C/T和C/M组的7天微生物清除率分别为57.9%、25.0%和2… 显示全部
在分析的95例患者中,C/C治疗方案的微生物清除率(64.7%)高于C/T(24.1%)和C/M(25.0%)(P = 0.002和P = 0.001)。在治疗耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)引起的感染的亚组分析中,C/C、C/T和C/M组的7天微生物清除率分别为57.9%、25.0%和29.4%(P = 0.122)。包括白细胞计数、C反应蛋白和降钙素原在内的炎症标志物在三组中均有改善。一些指标的下降具有统计学意义。然而,各治疗组的死亡率未见显著差异。此外,生存曲线分析表明,C/M治疗方案的生存时间显著长于C/C治疗方案。
C/C治疗方案在实现CR-GNB感染患者的微生物清除和改善炎症参数方面似乎更有效。虽然对生存率和生存时间的影响需要进一步研究,但C/C方案值得作为CR-GNB感染的一种有效治疗选择加以考虑。 9.4%(P = 0.122)。包括白细胞计数、C反应蛋白和降钙素原在内的炎症标志物在三组中均有改善。一些指标的下降具有统计学意义。然而,各治疗组的死亡率未见显著差异。此外,生存曲线分析表明,C/M治疗方案的生存时间显著长于C/C治疗方案。
C/C治疗方案在实现CR-GNB感染患者的微生物清除和改善炎症参数方面似乎更有效。虽然对生存率和生存时间的影响需要进一步研究,但C/C方案值得作为CR-GNB感染的一种有效治疗选择加以考虑。 显示全部
在分析的95例患者中,C/C治疗方案的微生物清除率(64.7%)高于C/T(24.