Alhabli Ibrahim, Ishaque Noman, Kate Mahesh, Alrohimi Anas, Singh Nishita, Benali Faysal, Horn MacKenzie, Buck Brian, Ademola Ayoola, Khosravani Houman, Appireddy Ramana, Moreau Francois, Gubitz Gordon, Tkach Aleksander, Catanese Luciana, Dowlatshahi Dariush, Pikula Aleksandra, Shankar Jai J, Williams Heather, Field Thalia S, Zafar Atif, Sajobi Tolulope, Swartz Richard, Poppe Alexandre Y, Demchuk Andrew M, Menon Bijoy K, Almekhlafi Mohammed, Bala Fouzi
Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2025-023336.
Thrombus migration can occur in patients receiving IV thrombolysis for acute stroke. This study compared the effects of IV tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) versus alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) on thrombus movement in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) in the AcT trial.
Patients with intracranial occlusion on baseline CT angiography (CTA) who underwent EVT were included. Thrombus movement from baseline CTA to first angiographic EVT run was classified as no thrombus movement, thrombus extension (TE, movement to a proximal location on DSA compared with CTA), thrombus migration (TM, movement to a more distal location), or recanalization. Outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 and final extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.
Of the 1577 patients in the AcT trial, 496 patients with intracranial occlusions underwent EVT (median age 73 years, 50.8% female). No thrombus movement was seen in 398 patients (80.2%), TE in six (1.2%), TM in 77 (15.5%), and complete recanalization in 15 (3.0%). Tenecteplase recipients (n=252) had higher TM rates than alteplase recipients (19.4% vs 11.5%, adjusted OR (aOR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.07). TM did not impact final successful reperfusion (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.38) but was associated with increased odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.06). Thrombolytic type did not affect the relationship between thrombus movement and study outcomes (P>0.05).
IV tenecteplase is associated with higher thrombus migration rates before EVT compared with alteplase, which is linked to better functional outcomes. However, the type of thrombolytic agent did not affect final reperfusion and functional outcomes.
接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性中风患者可能会发生血栓迁移。本研究在急性中风血栓溶解试验(AcT试验)中比较了静脉注射替奈普酶(0.25mg/kg)与阿替普酶(0.9mg/kg)对接受血管内治疗(EVT)患者血栓移动的影响。
纳入基线CT血管造影(CTA)显示颅内闭塞且接受EVT的患者。从基线CTA到首次血管造影EVT的血栓移动情况分为无血栓移动、血栓扩展(TE,与CTA相比,DSA上血栓移动到近端位置)、血栓迁移(TM,移动到更远端位置)或再通。结局指标为90天改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为0 - 2分以及最终脑梗死溶栓扩展评分2b - 3分。进行了混合效应逻辑回归分析。
在AcT试验的1577例患者中,496例颅内闭塞患者接受了EVT(中位年龄73岁,50.8%为女性)。398例患者(80.2%)未见血栓移动,6例(1.2%)有血栓扩展,77例(15.5%)有血栓迁移,15例(3.0%)完全再通。接受替奈普酶治疗的患者(n = 252)血栓迁移率高于接受阿替普酶治疗的患者(19.4%对11.5%,校正比值比[aOR]为1.83,95%置信区间为1.10至3.07)。血栓迁移不影响最终成功再灌注(aOR为0.76,95%置信区间为0.40至1.38),但与90天mRS评分为0 - 2分的几率增加相关(aOR为1.77,95%置信区间为1.05至3.06)。溶栓类型不影响血栓移动与研究结局之间的关系(P>0.05)。
与阿替普酶相比,静脉注射替奈普酶在EVT前与更高的血栓迁移率相关,这与更好的功能结局相关。然而,溶栓药物类型不影响最终再灌注和功能结局。