Mao Jiahao, Gao Zhen, Yu Wenyuan, Yu Yang
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 4;12:1645705. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1645705. eCollection 2025.
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an important treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure, which essentially replaces the left ventricle's pumping action to improve peripheral circulation. Its hemodynamic pattern (pulsatile vs. continuous flow) has been a popular research topic in the field. Because of its dependability and endurance, the continuous flow LVAD (CFVAD), as opposed to the first generation of pulsatile flow LVAD (PFVAD), has gained popularity as a mechanical support device in clinical practice in recent years. Many of the complications that arise with CFVAD application are thought to be related to reduced pulsatility. This article provides a review of the physiologic effects of different hemodynamic patterns on the circulatory system and the difference in outcomes of PFVAD vs. CFVAD.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)是终末期心力衰竭患者的重要治疗手段,它本质上替代了左心室的泵血功能以改善外周循环。其血流动力学模式(搏动性与连续性血流)一直是该领域热门的研究课题。与第一代搏动性血流左心室辅助装置(PFVAD)相比,连续性血流左心室辅助装置(CFVAD)因其可靠性和耐久性,近年来在临床实践中作为一种机械支持装置越来越受欢迎。CFVAD应用中出现的许多并发症被认为与搏动性降低有关。本文综述了不同血流动力学模式对循环系统的生理影响以及PFVAD与CFVAD在治疗结果上的差异。