Holscher Courtenay M, Dun Chen, Wu Y H Andrew, White Midori, Stonko David P, Schermerhorn Marc, Black James H, Abularrage Christopher J, Columbo Jesse A, Hicks Caitlin W
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/cmholscher.
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Chen_Dun.
Surgery. 2025 Aug 19;187:109622. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109622.
On 11 October 2023, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services expanded the indications for carotid artery stenting to include standard risk patients with symptomatic ≥50% and asymptomatic ≥70% carotid artery stenosis, providing surgeons an option between carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. This decision followed arguments both for and against the change by various professional societies, including opposition by the Society for Vascular Surgery. We sought to examine the impact of the change in policy with use of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.
We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all patients who underwent carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2024. Patients without 12 months of continuous Medicare enrollment before the procedure and/or younger than 18 years of age were excluded. Carotid artery stenting included both transfemoral and transcarotid revascularization. We evaluated the trends in use of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy overall and stratified by symptomatic status using hierarchical logistic regression models adjusting for patient and physician-level characteristics. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis with the time break set at October 2023 to evaluate the impact of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change on carotid artery stenting use.
There were 395,092 carotid revascularizations performed during the study period (median age 75.1 years, 59.9% male, 3.5% Black race), including 45.0% for symptomatic compared with 55.0% for asymptomatic disease, and 76.7% carotid endarterectomy compared with 23.3% carotid artery stenting. The proportion of carotid revascularizations performed using carotid artery stenting significantly increased over time (2017: 13.0% vs 2024: 37.99%; P < .001), including for both symptomatic (2017: 15.6% vs 2024: 40.9%; P < .001) and asymptomatic patients (2017: 11.0% vs 2024: 21.9%; P < .001). After adjusting for patient and treating physician-level variables, the use of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy increased by 28% per year since 2017 overall (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.29), including 25% in symptomatic patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.27) and 31% in asymptomatic patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.32). Based on the interrupted time series analysis, there was a significant decrease in carotid endarterectomy use (P = .001) and increase in carotid artery stenting use (P = .003) after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change on carotid artery stenting use in October 2023.
There has been a significant increase in carotid artery stenting use with a concomitant decline in carotid endarterectomy use since the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services decision to expand carotid artery stenting indications. Continued monitoring of these trends will be important to ensure optimal patient outcomes and appropriate use of carotid revascularization strategies.
2023年10月11日,美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心扩大了颈动脉支架置入术的适应症,将有症状且颈动脉狭窄≥50%的标准风险患者以及无症状且颈动脉狭窄≥70%的患者纳入其中,为外科医生提供了颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术之间的选择。这一决定是在包括血管外科学会在内的各种专业协会对这一变化进行了支持和反对的争论之后做出的。我们试图通过使用颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术来研究政策变化的影响。
我们使用100%的医疗保险按服务收费索赔数据,确定了2017年1月1日至2024年9月30日期间所有接受颈动脉支架置入术或颈动脉内膜切除术的患者。排除术前没有连续12个月参加医疗保险和/或年龄小于18岁的患者。颈动脉支架置入术包括经股动脉和经颈动脉血运重建。我们使用分层逻辑回归模型,在调整患者和医生层面特征的基础上,评估了与颈动脉内膜切除术相比颈动脉支架置入术的总体使用趋势以及按症状状态分层的趋势。我们进行了中断时间序列分析,将时间断点设定为2023年10月,以评估美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心政策变化对颈动脉支架置入术使用的影响。
在研究期间共进行了395,092例颈动脉血运重建术(中位年龄75.1岁,男性占59.9%,黑人占3.5%),其中有症状疾病患者占45.0%,无症状疾病患者占55.0%,颈动脉内膜切除术占76.7%,颈动脉支架置入术占23.3%。随着时间的推移,使用颈动脉支架置入术进行颈动脉血运重建的比例显著增加(2017年:13.0% vs 2024年:37.99%;P < .001),有症状患者(2017年:15.6% vs 2024年:40.9%;P < .001)和无症状患者(2017年:11.0% vs 2024年:21.9%;P < .001)均如此。在调整患者和治疗医生层面的变量后,自2017年以来,总体上使用颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比例每年增加28%(调整后的优势比为1.28;95%置信区间为1.28 - 1.29),有症状患者增加25%(调整后的优势比为1.25,95%置信区间为1.24 - 1.27),无症状患者增加31%(调整后的优势比为1.31,95%置信区间为1.30 - 1.32)。基于中断时间序列分析,2023年10月美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心对颈动脉支架置入术使用政策发生变化后,颈动脉内膜切除术的使用显著减少(P = .001),而颈动脉支架置入术的使用显著增加(P = .003)。
自美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心决定扩大颈动脉支架置入术适应症以来,颈动脉支架置入术的使用显著增加,同时颈动脉内膜切除术的使用相应减少。持续监测这些趋势对于确保患者获得最佳治疗效果以及合理使用颈动脉血运重建策略至关重要。