• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自身免疫性疾病患者脓毒症结局的比较分析:序贯器官衰竭评估评分、死亡率及疾病反应

A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Outcomes in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores, Mortality, and Disease Response.

作者信息

Bhat Ram, Sangathi Adarsh

机构信息

Professor, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India, Corresponding Author, Orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1507-710X.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2025 Jul;73(7):64-67. doi: 10.59556/japi.73.1033.

DOI:10.59556/japi.73.1033
PMID:40836723
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis results from the body's extreme response to pathogens and is associated with high mortality rates. Autoimmune diseases, treated with immunosuppressive medications, can weaken immune responses and increase susceptibility to sepsis. While older studies linked autoimmune disease and immunosuppressive treatment with higher mortality and longer hospital stays in sepsis patients, recent research suggests that these patients may not always have worse outcomes, in fact, they might have better outcomes, highlighting the need for further investigations.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate predictive factors of sepsis outcomes in individuals with underlying autoimmune diseases. (2) To quantify the severity of sepsis in the context of autoimmune diseases using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system. (3) To evaluate the influence of autoimmune disease therapy on sepsis outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 6-month prospective, observational cohort study was conducted with 83 participants at a single center. Patients were nearly evenly divided into autoimmune and nonautoimmune groups. Key variables including SOFA score at admission, sex distribution, mortality, and effect of autoimmune treatment regimens were analyzed using statistical methods such as Chi-squared tests, -tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Bonferroni tests.

RESULTS

A comparison between patients with autoimmune conditions and those without revealed a significant difference in sex distribution, with 73.2% of autoimmune patients being female compared to 42.9% in the nonautoimmune group ( = 7.818, = 0.005). Analysis of the SOFA scores showed that the nonautoimmune group had significantly higher mean scores (6.05) compared to autoimmune group (4.15) ( = 0.006). Septic shock occurred less frequently in the autoimmune group (26.8%) than in the nonautoimmune group (42.9%) but was not statistically significant ( = 2.345, = 0.126). Mortality was lower in individuals with autoimmune diseases (14.6%) compared to those without (23.8%), but lacked statistical significance ( = 1.122, = 0.289). Different treatment types for autoimmune diseases did not significantly affect mean SOFA scores ( = 1.918, = 0.144), indicating no major impact on sepsis outcomes. However, analyses suggested that untreated autoimmune patients had higher average SOFA scores than those on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), warranting further investigation into treatment effects.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed significantly low SOFA scores and better sepsis outcomes in patients with autoimmune diseases, highlighting the mitigating effects of autoimmune diseases and their treatment in sepsis. Even though many observed differences, including mortality, septic shock, and autoimmune disease treatment effects on sepsis, were not statistically significant, it highlights the need for further research to confirm these trends and understand the underlying mechanisms.

摘要

背景

脓毒症是机体对病原体的极端反应所致,与高死亡率相关。自身免疫性疾病患者接受免疫抑制药物治疗后,免疫反应会减弱,对脓毒症的易感性增加。虽然早期研究表明自身免疫性疾病和免疫抑制治疗会使脓毒症患者死亡率更高、住院时间更长,但近期研究显示这些患者的预后可能并不总是更差,事实上,他们可能有更好的预后,这凸显了进一步研究的必要性。

目的

(1)研究患有潜在自身免疫性疾病的个体中脓毒症预后的预测因素。(2)使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分系统量化自身免疫性疾病背景下脓毒症的严重程度。(3)评估自身免疫性疾病治疗对脓毒症预后的影响。

材料与方法

在单一中心对83名参与者进行了为期6个月的前瞻性观察队列研究。患者几乎平均分为自身免疫组和非自身免疫组。使用卡方检验、t检验、方差分析(ANOVA)和邦费罗尼检验等统计方法分析入院时的SOFA评分、性别分布、死亡率以及自身免疫治疗方案的效果等关键变量。

结果

自身免疫性疾病患者与非自身免疫性疾病患者的性别分布存在显著差异,73.2%的自身免疫性疾病患者为女性,而非自身免疫组为42.9%(χ² = 7.818,P = 0.005)。SOFA评分分析显示,非自身免疫组的平均评分(6.05)显著高于自身免疫组(4.15)(P = 0.006)。脓毒性休克在自身免疫组(26.8%)中的发生率低于非自身免疫组(42.9%),但差异无统计学意义(χ² = 2.345,P = 0.126)。自身免疫性疾病患者的死亡率(14.6%)低于无自身免疫性疾病的患者(23.8%),但差异无统计学意义(χ² = 1.122,P = 0.289)。自身免疫性疾病的不同治疗类型对平均SOFA评分无显著影响(F = 1.918,P = 0.144),表明对脓毒症预后无重大影响。然而,t检验表明未治疗的自身免疫性疾病患者的平均SOFA评分高于使用改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的患者,这值得进一步研究治疗效果。

结论

我们的研究表明,自身免疫性疾病患者的SOFA评分显著较低,脓毒症预后较好,凸显了自身免疫性疾病及其治疗对脓毒症的缓解作用。尽管观察到的许多差异,包括死亡率、脓毒性休克以及自身免疫性疾病治疗对脓毒症的影响,均无统计学意义,但这凸显了进一步研究以证实这些趋势并了解潜在机制的必要性。

相似文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Outcomes in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores, Mortality, and Disease Response.自身免疫性疾病患者脓毒症结局的比较分析:序贯器官衰竭评估评分、死亡率及疾病反应
J Assoc Physicians India. 2025 Jul;73(7):64-67. doi: 10.59556/japi.73.1033.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
[Clinical study on the effect of glycosaminoglycans on vascular endothelial glycocalyx in sepsis].[糖胺聚糖对脓毒症血管内皮糖萼影响的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jun;37(6):527-534. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240725-00634.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.