Suppr超能文献

解决糖尿病风险人群不平等问题的多层次糖尿病预防干预措施:范围审查

Multilevel Diabetes Prevention Interventions to Address Population Inequities in Diabetes Risk: Scoping Review.

作者信息

Patel Reshma, Kornas Kathy, Gerstle David, Diemert Lori M, Rosella Laura C

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T1P8, Canada, 1 4169786064.

University of Toronto Mississauga Library, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Aug 25;11:e70267. doi: 10.2196/70267.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes risk is disproportionately higher among structurally marginalized communities, partly due to influences from social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. Individual-level diabetes prevention strategies address proximal factors, such as modifiable behaviors, often overlooking the role of multilevel socioecological factors that contribute to diabetes risk and inequities. Multilevel diabetes prevention interventions involve actions that address multiple health determinants across the individual, community, and systemic levels of influence, offering a promising approach to reducing inequities in diabetes risk.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to systematically map the types of health determinants addressed in multilevel diabetes prevention interventions that have been implemented for addressing population inequities in diabetes risk and to describe what evidence exists regarding their effectiveness.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and gray literature sources (websites of government agencies and local/international nongovernmental health organizations) for studies published from the year 2000 to 2024. The research team developed a conceptual framework to guide the scoping review and define multilevel interventions for eligibility. Eligibility criteria included studies focusing on multilevel diabetes prevention interventions targeting diabetes relevant risk factors at more than one level of influence (micro, meso, and macro) and where intervention outcomes were reported. Data extraction included study characteristics, intervention target populations and coverage, targeted health determinants, and intervention outcomes and was completed by 2 independent reviewers. Data synthesis involved mapping health determinants addressed by each multilevel intervention according to our conceptual framework and a narrative synthesis of findings on themes corresponding to intervention types and reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 7813 articles retrieved, a total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions consisted of targeted interventions for high-risk populations (n=7), environmental-based interventions (n=7), and community-based interventions (n=11). Most interventions addressed health determinants at 2 levels (micro and macro) (14/25, 56%) or 3 levels (micro, meso, and macro) (11/25, 44%). All studies reported on proximal outcomes, most frequently on weight, physical activity, and dietary behaviors. One-third (8/25, 32%) of studies reported outcomes on changes in metabolic risk. None of the studies reported on equity outcomes related to changes in population inequities in diabetes incidence. Only 8% (n=2) of studies reported an equity outcome that captures disparities in a diabetes risk factor level between disadvantaged and advantaged population groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review identified a research gap in that outcomes on population inequities in diabetes risk have not been consistently measured in multilevel diabetes prevention interventions, and the impact of these interventions on reducing population inequities in diabetes incidence is not consistently examined or reported. Future research should prioritize equity outcomes in evaluations of multilevel diabetes prevention interventions and emphasize impacts on disadvantaged populations and population inequities.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病风险在结构上处于边缘地位的社区中不成比例地更高,部分原因是健康的社会、经济和环境决定因素的影响。个体层面的糖尿病预防策略解决的是近端因素,如可改变的行为,往往忽视了促成糖尿病风险和不平等的多层次社会生态因素的作用。多层次糖尿病预防干预措施涉及在个体、社区和系统影响层面解决多种健康决定因素的行动,为减少糖尿病风险的不平等提供了一种有前景的方法。

目的

本范围综述旨在系统梳理为解决糖尿病风险方面的人群不平等问题而实施的多层次糖尿病预防干预措施中所涉及的健康决定因素类型,并描述关于其有效性的现有证据。

方法

在PubMed、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和灰色文献来源(政府机构网站以及地方/国际非政府卫生组织网站)中进行了全面的文献检索,以查找2000年至2024年发表的研究。研究团队制定了一个概念框架来指导范围综述并定义纳入标准的多层次干预措施。纳入标准包括聚焦于针对糖尿病相关风险因素在多个影响层面(微观、中观和宏观)的多层次糖尿病预防干预措施且报告了干预结果的研究。数据提取包括研究特征、干预目标人群和覆盖范围、目标健康决定因素以及干预结果,由2名独立评审员完成。数据综合包括根据我们的概念框架梳理每项多层次干预措施所涉及的健康决定因素,以及对与干预类型和报告结果相对应主题的研究结果进行叙述性综合。

结果

在检索到的7813篇文章中,共有25项研究符合纳入标准。干预措施包括针对高危人群的靶向干预(n = 7)、基于环境的干预(n = 7)和基于社区的干预(n = 11)。大多数干预措施在两个层面(微观和宏观)(14/25,56%)或三个层面(微观、中观和宏观)(11/25,44%)解决健康决定因素。所有研究都报告了近端结果,最常见的是体重、身体活动和饮食行为方面的结果。三分之一(8/25,32%)的研究报告了代谢风险变化方面的结果。没有研究报告与糖尿病发病率人群不平等变化相关的公平性结果。只有8%(n = 2)的研究报告了一项公平性结果,该结果反映了弱势群体和优势群体在糖尿病风险因素水平上的差异。

结论

我们的综述发现了一个研究空白,即多层次糖尿病预防干预措施中尚未一致地衡量糖尿病风险方面的人群不平等结果,并且这些干预措施对减少糖尿病发病率人群不平等的影响也未得到一致的检验或报告。未来的研究应在多层次糖尿病预防干预措施的评估中优先考虑公平性结果,并强调对弱势群体和人群不平等的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/523e/12377877/fb94c8c1875e/publichealth-v11-e70267-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验