Yang Chuang, Wang Yunfei, Sun Yiyong, Sun Ying, Zhang Rongyu, Wang Chengjun, Song Yanan, Zhao Wen, Li Jisheng
Department of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhangqiu, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1572115. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1572115. eCollection 2025.
Despite significant survival improvements from third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), almost all patients eventually develop resistance. Currently, some studies have confirmed that combination therapy regimens based on third-generation EGFR-TKIs can further enhance efficacy. However, it remains unknown which specific combination regimen is more effective.
Randomized clinical trials comparing combination treatments involving third-generation EGFR-TKIs vs. EGFR-TKI single agent for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients were included. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Subgroup analyses were also conducted.
The study encompassed 5 trials, involving 1791 patients. The combination of osimertinib with chemotherapy and with ramucirumab, as well as the combination of lazertinib with amivantamab, have been shown to significantly improve PFS compared to osimertinib monotherapy. The combination of osimertinib with chemotherapy and the combination of lazertinib with amivantamab resulted in a significantly higher incidence of TRAEs compared to osimertinib monotherapy and other combination regimens. Osimertinib with chemotherapy showed better PFS in almost all the subgroup analyses. In patients with brain metastases, osimertinib plus chemotherapy appeared to offer clinical benefits over other treatment strategies, although statistical significance was only observed in comparison with osimertinib monotherapy.
This network meta-analysis suggests osimertinib plus pemetrexed-based chemotherapy as the only regimen demonstrating PFS benefits in the whole cohort and almost all the subgroup analyses, making it the optimal treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Given the higher incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs, careful consideration is needed in clinical practice.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42024579401.
尽管第三代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)显著提高了晚期EGFR突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率,但几乎所有患者最终都会产生耐药性。目前,一些研究证实基于第三代EGFR-TKIs的联合治疗方案可进一步提高疗效。然而,哪种具体的联合方案更有效仍不清楚。
纳入比较第三代EGFR-TKIs联合治疗与EGFR-TKI单药治疗晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者的随机临床试验。主要结局为无进展生存期(PFS),次要结局包括总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。还进行了亚组分析。
该研究纳入了5项试验,涉及1791例患者。与奥希替尼单药治疗相比,奥希替尼与化疗、与雷莫西尤单抗联合,以及拉泽替尼与阿美替尼联合均显示出显著改善PFS。与奥希替尼单药治疗和其他联合方案相比,奥希替尼与化疗联合、拉泽替尼与阿美替尼联合导致TRAEs发生率显著更高。奥希替尼与化疗在几乎所有亚组分析中均显示出更好的PFS。在脑转移患者中,奥希替尼加化疗似乎比其他治疗策略更具临床益处,尽管仅与奥希替尼单药治疗比较时观察到统计学意义。
该网络荟萃分析表明,奥希替尼加培美曲塞为基础的化疗是在整个队列和几乎所有亚组分析中唯一显示出PFS获益的方案,使其成为晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者的最佳治疗方案。鉴于≥3级TRAEs发生率较高,临床实践中需要谨慎考虑。