Shimoda Masafumi, Aso Jumpei, Tanaka Yoshiaki, Hirano Megumi, Morimoto Kozo, Yoshimori Kozo, Ishii Haruyuki, Ohta Ken, Saraya Takeshi
Respiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Kiyose, JPN.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Mitaka, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 24;17(7):e88673. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88673. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Single-ear (monaural) auscultation is occasionally used in lung examinations. In this method, a binaural stethoscope is placed in one ear, leaving the other ear free for listening to other sounds. To enhance the efficiency of medical examinations, interviews, and auscultation are sometimes performed simultaneously using single-ear auscultation. However, there are no studies reporting the accuracy of single-ear auscultation for lung examinations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the utility of single-ear and binaural auscultations.
We prospectively collected data from 35 respiratory physicians at Fukujuji Hospital and Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine from April 2024 to June 2024. Data on audible minimal volume, points earned from auscultation questions, and self-reported confidence levels for answers to auscultation questions were compared between single-ear and binaural auscultations in both quiet and noisy environments. Furthermore, participants were divided into those with a respiratory specialist qualification (specialist group) and those without the qualification (nonspecialist group), and subanalysis was performed between these two groups.
Single-ear auscultation resulted in fewer earned points than binaural auscultation in both quiet environments (median 12 points (range 7-15) vs. 13 points (9-16), <0.001) and noisy environments (median 12 points (range 5-16) vs. 13 points (8-16), =0.008). The average self-reported confidence levels were also lower for single-ear auscultation (quiet environment: <0.001; noisy environment: <0.001). The average audible minimal volume was not different between the single-ear and binaural auscultations (quiet environment: =0.814; noisy environment: =0.051). Twenty-three participants (65.7%) scored 1 or more points higher during binaural auscultation than during single-ear auscultation in both environments. There was no difference between the respiratory specialists and nonspecialists in the number of participants exhibiting advantages during binaural auscultation or in the difference in average audible minimal volume, earned points from auscultation questions, or average self-reported confidence levels for answers to auscultation questions between single-ear and binaural auscultations.
The utility of single-ear auscultation for lung auscultation was less than that of binaural auscultation. Physicians should use a binaural stethoscope correctly and listen with both ears.
单耳(单声道)听诊偶尔用于肺部检查。在这种方法中,将双耳听诊器放在一只耳朵上,另一只耳朵空出来听其他声音。为提高医学检查效率,有时会使用单耳听诊同时进行问诊和听诊。然而,尚无研究报告单耳听诊用于肺部检查的准确性。因此,本研究旨在比较单耳听诊和双耳听诊的效用。
我们前瞻性地收集了2024年4月至2024年6月来自福住寺医院和杏林大学医学院的35位呼吸内科医生的数据。比较了在安静和嘈杂环境下单耳听诊和双耳听诊在可听最小音量、听诊问题得分以及听诊问题答案的自我报告置信水平方面的数据。此外,将参与者分为具有呼吸专科资格的人员(专科组)和没有该资格的人员(非专科组),并在这两组之间进行亚分析。
在安静环境(中位数12分(范围7 - 15)对13分(9 - 16),<0.001)和嘈杂环境(中位数12分(范围5 - 16)对13分(8 - 16),=0.008)中,单耳听诊的得分均低于双耳听诊。单耳听诊的平均自我报告置信水平也较低(安静环境:<0.001;嘈杂环境:<0.001)。单耳听诊和双耳听诊之间的平均可听最小音量没有差异(安静环境:=0.814;嘈杂环境:=0.051)。在两种环境中,23名参与者(65.7%)在双耳听诊时的得分比单耳听诊时高1分或更多。在双耳听诊时表现出优势的参与者数量,以及单耳听诊和双耳听诊之间在平均可听最小音量、听诊问题得分或听诊问题答案的平均自我报告置信水平方面的差异,呼吸专科医生和非专科医生之间没有差异。
单耳听诊用于肺部听诊的效用低于双耳听诊。医生应正确使用双耳听诊器并用双耳进行听诊。