Asraf Kfir, Gaisler-Salomon Inna
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Integrative Brain and Behavior Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Biomolecules. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):1154. doi: 10.3390/biom15081154.
Cognitive flexibility, the ability to adapt behavior to changing environmental demands, is a core deficit in schizophrenia (SZ), that predicts disease progression. This review synthesizes findings on the neural substates of cognitive flexibility by using a framework that distinguishes animal model tasks by their motivational valence: aversive versus appetitive. While human studies using tasks like the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) reveal significant cognitive inflexibility in SZ, particularly in set shifting, rodent models provide important mechanistic insights. The current literature suggests that aversive tasks, such as water mazes, and appetitive tasks, such as the Birrel-Brown discrimination task, engage distinct neural circuits, despite assessing supposedly similar cognitive processes. Aversive paradigms primarily rely on hippocampal-medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) pathways, whereas appetitive tasks heavily involve orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-striatal circuits, with significant modulation by dopamine and serotonin. Both valences seem to require an intact balance of glutamate and GABA transmission within prefrontal regions. This framework helps clarify inconsistencies in the literature and underscores how motivational context shapes the neural substrates of cognitive flexibility.
认知灵活性,即根据不断变化的环境需求调整行为的能力,是精神分裂症(SZ)的核心缺陷,且能预测疾病进展。本综述通过使用一种根据动机效价区分动物模型任务的框架,即厌恶型与奖赏型,综合了关于认知灵活性神经子状态的研究结果。虽然使用威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)等任务的人类研究揭示了精神分裂症患者存在显著的认知灵活性缺陷,尤其是在定势转换方面,但啮齿动物模型提供了重要的机制性见解。当前文献表明,厌恶型任务(如水迷宫)和奖赏型任务(如Birrel-Brown辨别任务),尽管评估的是看似相似的认知过程,但涉及不同的神经回路。厌恶型范式主要依赖海马-内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)通路,而奖赏型任务则大量涉及眶额皮质(OFC)-纹状体回路,多巴胺和5-羟色胺对其有显著调节作用。两种效价似乎都需要前额叶区域内谷氨酸和γ-氨基丁酸传递的完整平衡。这个框架有助于澄清文献中的不一致之处,并强调了动机背景如何塑造认知灵活性的神经基础。